Laserfiche WebLink
A <br />Page 4 <br />but samples were taken to assess the effectiveness of the plant. <br />10. The May water level, and June full suite parameters for NEW-4 were measured. Other <br />information which you have requested is not available. Monitoring of this site was <br />linked to the approval of TR-34. Page A-48 has been modified accordingly. <br />11. Lead and selenium were undetected in the samples for PRS-1. The November pH, May <br />EC and 1994 summary values have all been corrected (A-82 and A-85). <br />12. Lead and selenium were undetected in the samples for PRS-2 (A-86 and A-89). Ice <br />precluded a flow measurement in December. <br />13. Flow and field information for site PRS-4 was added for November, but was unavailable <br />for February and August. The May pH and April EC have been corrected (A-94 and A- <br />95). <br />14. Site SCF-1 was reported as dry on the monitoring report, however, there was enough <br />water to take a sample but not enough to measure flow (A-96 and A-97). <br />15. The February flow has been added for site WCS-1, and the March EC has been corrected <br />(A-103 through A-105). <br />Mine Inflow <br />1. Figure C-2 (page C-8) has been modified to reflect corrected 1994 data. In addition, <br />page C-6 has been modified. <br />2. Point 35 has been removed from the mine inflow map, as no data was collected. <br />3. Point 52 and point 8 are the same. <br />Additional changes were made during the course of this review. Some revised pages are <br />the additional pages associated with some of the historical tables. Revised pages, previously <br />unmentioned include: A-2, A-3, A-4, A-7, A-14, A-49, A-51, A-52, A-66, A-67, A-78, A-79, <br />A-83, A-84, A-90a, A-90b, A-98, and A-99. <br />