Laserfiche WebLink
<br />NCIG financial, lnc. <br />December 2, ] 994 <br />Page 2 <br />overall Lailurc is greater than 1.3. The analysis is b:rscd on chart solutions (FIoek and <br />Bray, 1977) and appears applicable to the conslr'ucted grading, <br />fhc stability of slopes can be impacted by poor surface drainage and inadequate <br />revcgclation. We assume that the druinasc and rcvegctation conditions have bccn <br />addressed by others. <br />'this evaluation has bccn conducted according to generally accepted gcotcchuical <br />cnbiuccring principles mid practices in this area at this lime. The conclusions arc based on <br />the information provided, our cursory review of the sift and experience in the area. <br />Subsurface exploration and testing and measurements of the constructed cmbarilaucuts <br />have not bccn pcrlormed. Variations in the assumed slope conditions could change the <br />conclusions made in this report. <br />If you have any questions or if we can be of further assistance, please Icf us I:now. <br />Sincerely, <br />I-IEPWOP:fI-I-PAWLAK GEOTECI-INICAL, INC. <br />... C: <br />Stcvcn L. Pawlal., P.E.' I.~r.Zl~~,.., <br />~:1- ;.. <br />SLPh'o ,~~' •~`: <br />Attach+ncnl <br />Rclerences: <br />Chen and Associates, 1935, Subsmfcrce SRrcly for Dervnlerin~ S(ruclure and Thickener <br />Foundations and Grudin,>; Design, Schmuescr and Associates, .rob No, 4 362 36, <br />November I1, 1955. <br />1locl., E. and Bray, .l. W., 1977, Poc%Sl0/)c EYtgu7ecl'U7g, 2nd Edition, LM.M., London. <br />H-P GEOTECH <br />