Laserfiche WebLink
-- <br />and OU-14 have now been abandoned in conjunction with the <br />reclamation. <br />20} As pointed out in the initial response to the 1lidterm <br />Review, the table 3.5-1, regarding the partical size, had been <br />approved by the Division on three other previous occasions. It <br />first appeared as part of the 1984 permit document and was <br />approved, then again as part of the 1988 permit renewal and <br />approved, as well as the 1990 document, which was once again <br />approved. The data was developed in 1983 by a registered <br />professional geologist, working for a consulting company. This <br />company is no longer in existance. Since the author of the Table <br />was a registered professional in the State of Colorado, and the <br />three previous Division reviewers found the data to be correct, it <br />should be assumed to be correct now. <br />~1? <br />22} A corrected page without the printing error will be <br />submitted, under separate cover, by hr, tlichael Galloway. <br />25) Corrected page attached hereto. <br />35} There will be no Wore groundwater monitoring, because all <br />monitoring wells, with the approval of the Division, have been <br />abandoned, Uhat shall the TR, as suaaested, contain? <br />Sincerely, <br />~r ~.~~, <br />E. Peter 1latthies <br />ll'~1141,;; -11 m;'rii <br />