Laserfiche WebLink
~:. <br />We recognize that noise is not within the authority of the CMLRB to control. ]t is a <br />responsibility of Park County, but there does not appear to be any codes limiting <br />noise created from mining. Use of high intense lights up until mid-night and on <br />weekends have created a new and very negative disturbance. Increases in dust are <br />visibly evident. The residential areas within 3 miles of the mine may have suffered a <br />significant impact of property values. Therefore, approval of the permit application <br />may further impact these values. Also, as a sidelight, we are concerned that living <br />conditions at the mine are forcing workers to live in trailers off-site that may not meet <br />zoning restrictions. <br />• Reclamation Performance Standards. 3.l <br />Prior to any official action on the permit application, we request a written summary of <br />past compliance with reclamation requirements. We recognize that a number of <br />operators have come and gone, but we are especially interested in compliance since <br />the 1976 Reclamation Act. We believe this is pertinent in showing to the CMLRB <br />the level of compliance and effectiveness of reclamation that this mine and operators <br />have demonstrated. <br />• Water. 3.1.6 <br />The mine utilizes surface water from the Middle Fork of the South Platte River. It <br />also has storage ponds on the site. Rules require that water usage must comply with <br />existing statutes governing diversion, augmentation and water quality. It appears that <br />heavy erosion exists on the mine site that may impact local wildlife habitat and <br />natural drainages. Also, the existing pump from the river represents a change in the <br />legal point of historic upstream diversion. Is this a legal diversion and is there an <br />approved augmentation plan for evaporation from the mine ponds? Adjacent homes <br />depend on shallow wells for domestic water. The glacial material is porous and <br />easily transmits silt and surface disturbed soil. is there any assurance that expanded <br />mining will not impact adjacent domestic wells? We do not believe there is adequate <br />permit information to address this issue. Mine-induced erosion within the disturbed <br />area, including ambient dust also impacts water quality and vegetative growth. We <br />recognize that air quality is the responsibility of the Department of Health and request <br />their analysis. The Division of Water Resources should address the water issues. <br />• Reveeetation.3.1.10 <br />The mine is at an elevation of over 10,000 feet above sea level and conditions to <br />assure effective revegetation of disturbed areas is costly. To meet the conditions of <br />3.1.10 requires diverse and long-lasting vegetation. This vegetation should also be <br />suitable for wildlife. Big game in particular, require selected shrubs that withstand <br />harsh winters and dry conditions. Raptors use mature pine trees and small mammals <br />prefer dead logs, grasses and areas where burrowing is possible. Stable ground cover <br />reduces erosion which is especially bad in this area. If these conditions have been <br />met in the past, then effective reclamation has occurred. It is our opinion that past <br />reclamation has not been effective and the requested permit does not have adequate <br />conditions for revegetation, especially in relation to wildlife benefits. <br />