Laserfiche WebLink
III. COMMENTS -COMPLIANCE <br />Below are comments on the inspection. The comments include discussion of observations made <br />during the inspection. Comments also describe any enforcement actions taken during the inspection <br />and the facts or evidence supporting the enforcement action. <br />conducted by DMG and BLM, it was determined that no further inspection of the sites was warranted at <br />this time. Further, based on those inspections and BLM's satisfaction with the reclamation conducted, it is <br />my conclusion that drill hole sealing, drill sitebackfilling, and drill site access road regrading associated <br />with sites PCC-01 through PCC-10 was satisfactorily completed and qualifies for Phase I bond release. <br />One additional drill site (GWMS-03) waz approved under the South Lease Exploration Plan, and the drill <br />hole was sealed. However two additional monitoring wells were drilled at this location, and reclamation of <br />this site will not occur until the monitoring is terminated and the wells (GWMS 03a and 03b) are sealed <br />(see Item 56 of the current cost estimate). <br />CRDA-1 and CRDA-2 <br />For a number of reasons, the Division will not propose to approve Phase ]bond release for the reclaimed <br />CRDA•1 and CRDA-2 benches at this time. As discussed below, the construction and non-toxic cover <br />placement for the lower three benches of both refuse piles appears to have been completed in compliance <br />with permit requtrements. However, regrading and cover placement on the upper two benches and final <br />grading of the upper terrace drains, rip-rapping of upper segments of the permanent perimeter ditches, and <br />certain other regrading tasks have not been completed. Rule 3.03. I (2)(a) specifies that, for Phase I bond <br />release, "[U]p to sixty percent of the applicable bond amount shall be released when thepermittee <br />successfully completes backfilling, regrading, and drainage control in accordance with the approved <br />reclamation plan" The Division's interpretation of this rule for refuse piles, is thatregrading, cover soil <br />placement, and installation of final drainage controls for the entire refuse pile must be completed prior to <br />Phase l bond release for the pile (or portion of a pile). Until the enCve pile and associated permanent <br />drainage system has been completed, there is the potential for erosion and sedimentation from bare refuse <br />areas and unfinished upper perimeter ditch segments to impact lower portions of the refuse pile diversion <br />and collection system, including the terrace drains. This increazes the potential for sediment deposition and <br />erosion on reclaimed benches. Deposition ofcoaly sediments or erosion of the reclaimed benches or lower <br />ditch segments would necessitateroitigative work on the completed areas. <br />th the specific case of CRDA-l, final grading of the upper two benchoutslopes and tertace drains has not <br />been completed, upper bench terrace drain outslopes are over-steepened in some locations, the upper two <br />benches have not been cover-soiled, and upper segments of the permanent perimeter ditches have not been <br />riprapped. Essentially the same situation existed at CRDA-2. U addition, on CRDA-2, a temporary <br />haulage road angles across the face of the pile, and completion of final terrace drains on the reclaimed <br />benches in accordance with approved final designs cannot be performed until the road has been reclaimed. <br />Further, at CRDA-2, the Division has identified concerns with the suitability of the existing upper diversion <br />as a permanent structure, and a new upper diversion is to be completed az a component of CRDA-2 final <br />reclamation. <br />Given the possibility that the Division's proposed decision to deny Phase I releaze for the refuse areaz <br />based on the above interpretation ar:d reasoning may be appealed, an evaluation of construction compliance <br />and apparent stability of the reclaimed lower benches was conducted. During the bond release evaluation, <br />DMG requested additional documentation of compliance with construction and reclamation requvements <br />associated with the reclaimed benches of CRDA-1 and CRDA-2, for which Phaze l bond release was <br />requested. Adequate docwnentation was provided. <br />