My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV88620
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV88620
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 3:10:43 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 10:43:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981039
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
8/24/1989
Doc Name
PITS 5 & 6
From
MLRD
To
GRASSY GAP MIDTERM FILE
Type & Sequence
MT1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />i ii iiiiiiiiiiiiiiii <br />999 <br />STATE OF COLO <br />Roy Romer, Gove <br />DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES <br />MINED LAND RECLAMATION DIVISION <br />FRED R. BANTA, Director <br />GATE: August 24, 1989 <br />T0: Grassy Gap Mid-Term File <br />FROM: Susan Mowry C~~~ <br />RE: Pits 5 and 6 <br />On July 19, 1989 I inspected the Grassy Gap mine site. Mr. John Elliot, <br />geomorphologist with the U.S. Geological Survey, was able to meet me and <br />inspect pits 5 and o with me. I had requested nis assistance in evaluating <br />the reclaimed topograpny and stability of these two pit areas. <br />Based on our discussion, I have come to the following conclusions: <br />The reclaimed topography in pit 6 does meet AO C. Adjacent undisturbed slopes <br />exnibit a similar oasic configuration. Tne pit was enclosed by a low wall and <br />hign wall during the mining phase. Both the highwall and low wall have been <br />completely backfilled. The vestiges of these confines are evident in the <br />reclaimed pit area. All the backfill has been replaced within these <br />confines. The coal seam removed was several feet thick. This void snould be <br />compensated for by spoil swell fairly equally. There are two small <br />depressions where water ponds within the reclaimed area out overall positive <br />drainage has been estaolisned. For these reasons I believe the pit 6 <br />reclaimed topography meets AO C. <br />I do not believe that pit 5 reclaimed topography meets AO C. Several features <br />currently exist in the reclaimed topography which I do not believe were <br />pre-existing. Tnese features are as follows: an over steepened slope in the <br />area of the reclaimed southwest highwall, a large flat area in the south <br />central region of the reclaimed pit, an oversteepened slope immediately above <br />the natural drainage along the north edge of the reclaimed pit, a road <br />bisecting the nortneast and southwest portions, a nicx point along the south <br />highwall (where the reclaimed slope dips then rises to meet the natural <br />slope), and shifting of the ridge top location to the southeast. Currently <br />55-50% slopes are found at the top and base of the reclaimed area. These <br />slopes are comparaole to pre-mining slopes which were 50-62%. The lengtn of <br />these siopes is less in the post-mining topograpny, tnereby lending to the <br />overall staoility of the site. <br />The oversteepened slopes have been suoject to some rill erosion. Several <br />rills were noted on born the slopes at the southwest and along the north. <br />However, the worst is probably over and the "healing" process appears to have <br />begun. Vegetation regrowth appears to be largely successful. This area is <br />scheduled for vegetation sampling in late August. Overall the reconfigured <br />pit appears stable. No tension cracks or slumps were noted on an.y of the <br />siopes. <br />215 Centennial Building, 1313 Sherman Street Denver, Colorado 80203-2273 Tel. (303) 666-3567 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.