My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV88588
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV88588
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 3:10:42 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 10:43:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981044
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
2/13/1997
Doc Name
EAGLE 5 & 9 MINE C-81-044 TR29 ADEQUACY REVIEW 2
From
DMG
To
CYPRUS EMPIRE CORP
Type & Sequence
TR29
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
F- <br />1, <br />On page 2.05.4-24R6, it is stated that if the No. 9 Portal and refuse pile are not returned <br />to cropland, they would be returned to pastureland, and adjacent fields cunently mapped <br />as cropland would be used as the reference azea. On page 2.05.4-25R it is stated that "the <br />same revegetation success criteria methodology that was described for rangeland/wildlife <br />habitat will be used for pastureland." Some demonstration of reference area suitability <br />will be necessary, and the vegetation map will need to be appropriately updated to <br />reference dryland pasture rather than cropland, and to delineate the dryland pasture <br />reference area. Also, does the statement on page 2.05.4-25R imply that the woody plant <br />density standazd as well as the diversity standazd specified for rangeland also apply to <br />pastureland? This should be clarified in the text. <br />Table 67A indicates that the No. 9 Portal and adjacent azea would be reclaimed to either <br />grain or hay cropland, but does not mention the alternative of dryland pasture. My <br />understanding was that the potential postmining uses for this azea were either small grain <br />dryland cropland or dryland pastureland, but not hay cropland. This needs to be clarified. <br />24. Map 20 should be amended to accurately depict the elevationally based range sites within <br />the Utah Tract, consistent with the narrative description of the range sites, if that is the <br />appropriate range site delineation as outlined in the Trapper permit. However, some <br />explanation should be provided for why the range sites were originally delineated as they <br />aze on the current Map 20. <br />25. Page 2.05.4-16R was appropriately amended to address the designated plant growth media <br />in the vicinity of the SA Portal. <br />Please propose the location of a general sign that can be placed azound topsoil substitute <br />material. <br />Please contact Dan Mathews at the Grand Junction Field Office prior to responding to these <br />concerns. Dan can be reached at (970) 242-5025. The revision decision due date has recently <br />been extended to Mazch 11, 1997. <br />Please call if you have any questions. <br />Sincerely, <br />~'~. S ~~~ <br />Erica S. Crosby <br />Environmental Protection Specialist <br />c:\wp51 \misc\970213 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.