My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV88252
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV88252
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 3:10:27 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 10:40:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1976009HR
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
12/2/1996
Doc Name
EXHIBIT I SOILS INFO
Type & Sequence
AM3
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
84
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />FIGURE 9: Wnd (monthly) <br />mbndO Spnnpa. Wb2Eo <br />I]- <br />II]- <br /> <br />10 ]- <br />10- <br />Z <br />P]- <br />P- <br />~]- <br />8n PM Mar 1q WY Any .WN Ap LP Ocl My Cc <br />MIT <br />• Climate <br />N <br />x,A.Y UEfl61N[fAiE PREVAIIIq GRECIIM <br />M <br />SSE <br />M <br />MNE <br />NMV <br />6E <br />NK x NfE <br />x <br />SITE MOD/FICAT/ONS: Wind factors along the Front Range Urban Corridor shoH• very significant <br />variations depending upon the relationship of the site to the mountain front. Generally, near the mountains <br />the winds are considerably greater than they are even a short distance further east. This is especially true <br />during the non-growing season. Strong downslope, warming winds aze common in wince- and are a very <br />significant factor affecting winter survival of especially evergreen plants. This site is prone to severe winds <br />that blow downslope and to a lesser extent laterally along the mountain face. <br />The Colorado Springs weather station is generally outside the azea of strong wind influence. <br />Therefore, the data presented in Figure 4 has limited utility to this site. Colorado Springs c; windier, on the <br />average, than most other areas along the Front Range Urban Corridor, but the desiccating winds of winter are <br />probably not much different at this site than they are elsewhere. Thus, consideration should lte given to using <br />moisture conserving techniques if conifers are to be planted. Afternoon shading and rapid cooling in winter <br />offsets the negative effects of wind to some extent. <br />PATTERNS OF ANNUAL VARIATION <br />Figtue 5 shows the annual precipitation for Colorado Springs between 1956 and 198:i. The 1957 and <br />1965 peaks were clearly anomalous and should not be relied upon to estimate drought periods and periods of <br />better than average moisture. During this period (1956-1985), 14 years were below normal and 16 years were <br />above normal. As a rule the annual variations range about 2 inches on either side of the average annual <br />precipitation indicated by the horizontal line. Between 1976 and 1985 there were far more wet yeazs than dry <br />years. Although data since 1985 is available, it is not in a condensed form and probably would show similar <br />pattems of vaziation. <br />This variation in precipitation shows that deviations from the average are razely extreme and should <br />not significantly influence the long term success of a revegetation program. Of course, tF.ese pattems can <br />change abruptly. From 1959 to 1964 there was a general decline in annual precipitation, but in 1965 <br />precipitation increased by nearly three times over 1964. Since 1965 the variations have been moderate, except <br />for 1974. This is quite consistent with what has been observed previously in revegetation programs. <br />Menzer Quarry Amendment Exhibit K Page 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.