Laserfiche WebLink
OeFiler, Larry <br />From: Posey, Harry `~ / <br />Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 9:20 AM <br />To: Oehler, Larry v <br />Subject: RE: <br />I agree with your approach, and the need to keep them separate, <br />As you are aware, the TR-6 requests are not generally contained in the AM application language, so without submitting a <br />technical revision to the Amendment, we'd have to either deny the TR request, or let it go automatic. I think we're on the <br />right track. KK /evi:.,k Kf,_ ir- ~ _ .,, , _ ~_ ~L'r.»~ <br />-----Original Message----- <br />From: Oehler, Larry <br />Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 2:37 PM <br />To: Posey, Harry <br />Subject: <br />Section/Exhibit <br />! Class: yy..~~J+Revision ~ <br />'_ YP 9: _____ ________ <br />T_-' --------- - <br />Class: ~ Report ^ Hydro eneral <br />Doc Type: <br />DApplication (Coal only) ^ Bond O Enforcement ^ Inspection <br />« File: Wendi Abbott TR-6 2nd Adeq. 8-15-02.doc » <br />