My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1999-01-19_REVISION - M1977326 (5)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1977326
>
1999-01-19_REVISION - M1977326 (5)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/16/2021 5:45:28 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 10:39:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977326
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
1/19/1999
Doc Name
SILOAM CLAY MINE PN M-77-326 TR
From
ROBINSON BRICK CO
To
DMG
Type & Sequence
TR1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Review or Blasting Operations at Robinson Brick Company's Siloam Clay Mine <br /> Blasting researchers, over many years, have developed and verified the validity of using scaled <br /> relationships to predict vibration intensity at various distances. These relationships use scaling <br /> theory to define the relationship between ground vibration particle velocity, charge weight, and <br /> distance. Distance is scaled by the square root of charge weight to create a single dependent <br /> variable called scaled distance (SD). Various forms of this relationship are shown in Equation 2.1. <br /> ppv= K (SD)") and SD=YVr (Equation 2.1) <br /> Where: ppv= Peak Particle Velocity (in/sec) <br /> K and m = site attenuation constants <br /> SD = Scaled Distance(ft/Ib") <br /> D = Distance(ft) <br /> W = Maximum charge weight per delay(Ib) <br /> When plotted on log-log paper, data points defined by scaled distance and measured particle <br /> velocity generally fall between boundaries defined by Oriard (1972), as shown in Figure 2.3. The <br /> slope of plotted data (m) is usually around —1.6 and the K factor for predicting particle velocity in <br /> the upper limit of the normally confined charges 242. For cautious predictions, GEOTEK has <br /> used a K factor of 300 in all calculations for estimating particle velocities in the various analyses <br /> done in this report. <br /> GEOTEK&Associates, Inc. Page 7 January 99 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.