My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV88089
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV88089
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 3:10:20 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 10:39:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981048
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
7/14/1983
Doc Name
ADEQUACY REVIEW OF TR 3 SEDIMENTATION POND 2 AT LUDLOW LOAD OUT
From
MLRD
To
TRINIDAD BASIN MINING INC
Type & Sequence
TR5
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
~~ iii ~iiiiii~u `~t~~-~.~~4.~ <br />DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES <br />D. Monte Pascoe Erecul.ve Dnector <br />MINED LAND RECLAMATION DI <br />DAVID C. SHELTON, Director <br />H~charC D. Lamm <br />Governor <br />July 14, 1983 <br />Mr: Vance Mills <br />Trinidad Basin Mining, Inc. <br />P.O. Box 783 <br />Trinidad, Colorado 81082 <br />Re: Adequacy Review of TR No. 3 (Sedimentation Pond No. 2 at Ludlow, <br />Load-out) <br />Dear Mr. Mills: <br />The Dtvlston has identified the following concerns during the adequacy <br />review of the above referenced technical revision. <br />9. The Division needs to have a map of the Ludlow load-out area with <br />sufficient topographic definition to allow analysts of drainage and <br />design elevations, throughout the load-out area. The Dlviston would <br />suggest a contour Interval not to exceed five feet. This map should show <br />all surface facilities and structures and be certified. <br />2. In the text of the TR the operator should commit to providing the <br />Dlviston with a "built as designed" certification within 60 days of <br />completion of the sediment pond. <br />3. The Division feels that the use of a curve number value of 60 is <br />inappropriate given the site conditions at the Ludlow load-out. The <br />Division requests that a curve number value of 90 be used and that <br />corresponding charges 1n the design calculations be made. <br />The Dtvlston will continue reviewing the technical revision, and w111 <br />contact you 1f other concerns are identified. <br />If you have any questions please feel free to call. <br />Sincerely, <br />~~~ ~-- <br />Mtchael S. Savage <br />Reclamation Specialist <br />cc: Mr. Ben Quinn <br />MSS/tlh <br />Doc. No. 4312 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.