Laserfiche WebLink
r <br />Mr. Conn <br />USES proposed Stipulation No. 1 <br />annually maps 2.8.1.c (revised) <br />met by inclusion of these maps <br />-2- <br />September 5, 1986 <br />which requires the applicant to update <br />and 2.8.1.g showing current water uses may be <br />in future annual hydrologic reports. <br />In response to USFS proposed Stipulation 2, WECC should demonstrate that the <br />hydrologic monitoring plan will "...monitor those springs/ponds during the <br />period of possible subsidences at a frequency commensurate with risk of water <br />loss during actual and planned seasonal livestock use." <br />USFS proposed Stipulation 3 is intended to ensure that WECC get their proposed <br />"contingency plan" in place prior to projected subsidence (secondary recovery) <br />of any of the springs and ponds. Therefore, the Division requires WECC to <br />verify that the contingency plan will be implemented and functional prior to <br />secondary recovery. <br />USFS proposed Stipulations 1, 2 and 3 must be resolved to the satisfaction of <br />both the Division and the USFS as quickly as possible. WECC should prepare a <br />response to the USFS comments and forward copies to the District Ranger and <br />the Division as soon as possible. WECC should also forward the Division a <br />copy of the District Ranger's response. This is a matter of high priority and <br />should be treated as such. A quick response to the Division and the District <br />Ranger along with their consent will expedite the permit renewal decision <br />process. <br />If you have any questions on this matter, please contact me or Bob Liddle. <br />Sincerely, <br />°'' ~:~L~r'' <br />Thomas A. Schreiner <br />Reclamation Specialist <br />TAS/vj r <br />Enclosure(s) <br />3375E <br />