Laserfiche WebLink
i ' 232 <br />' 1 no requirement in terms of the total volumes that <br />' 2 result for any spillways in the diversion facilities <br /> 3 during operation or any diversion facilities that <br />' 4 could take care of that 19 inches during operations. <br /> 5 We have in excess of 2 feet of freeboard <br /> 6 as a mandated freeboard on the seepage pond, 19 <br /> 7 inches being in that instance the direct <br />' 8 precipitation that would fall on that pond. <br />' 9 There is no other runoff which ca:i get <br /> 10 into that pond (inaudible). Precipitation is it. <br /> 11 You must remember that the facility initially is <br /> 12 designed to start off with in excess of 90 feet by <br />' 13 technical definition of freeboard between where we <br /> 14 start the operation to the crest of the embankment. <br />' 15 There is no time during the operational <br /> 16 period of the facility where we would have less <br />' <br /> 17 capacity than would result from a 19-inch storm <br />' 18 event. our design criteria and the way the facility <br /> 19 is designed is Such that there is that excess <br />' 20 storage capacity simply because we constructed that <br /> 21 storage question, not because we elected to have <br />' 22 that desi <br />n crit <br />ria e <br />u <br />d <br />i <br />rite <br />ia <br />uch <br />l <br /> g <br />e <br />q <br />some <br />es <br />gn c <br />s <br />a <br />r <br />' 23 as the PMP. <br /> 24 In terms of erosion control -- there <br />' 25 were three questions raised in terms o£ whether or <br />AGREN, BLANDO & BILLINGS <br />L <br />