My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1990-11-15_REVISION - M1988112 (3)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1988112
>
1990-11-15_REVISION - M1988112 (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/19/2021 12:54:08 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 10:39:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1988112
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
11/15/1990
Doc Name
REPORTS TRANSCRIPT OF PUBLIC HEARING VOLUME I APPLICATION OF BATTLE MENT PART 2
Type & Sequence
AM1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
162
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 <br />' 230 <br />t 1 flood events? <br /> 2 What we have referenced in our report is <br />' <br /> 3 an a-hour PMP which has a total precipitation volume <br />' 4 of 14 inches. What the expert this morning for <br /> 5 opposition indicated was that was 19 inches. Now, <br /> 6 that has a duration, I should say -- not recurrence, <br /> 7 but a duration of 24 hours. <br />' 8 Now, if you are going to choose a flat <br /> 9 event to characterize what peak flows are going to <br />1 l0 b <br />t <br />i <br />l <br />t <br />h <br />i <br /> e, you <br />yp <br />cal <br />y look a <br />the catchment s <br />ze, t <br />e <br />' 11 time of concentration, and choose that flood. So <br /> 12 the particular catchment size we are dealing with <br />' 13 now is of 8-hour duration, valid flood event. <br /> 14 You then take that -- that, obviously, <br />' 15 for 14 inches over 8 hours, results in a higher- <br /> 16 intensity precipitation than 19 inches over <br />' 17 24 h <br />th <br />S <br />th <br />k th <br />t <br />f <br />t <br />t <br /> ours. <br />o <br />e pea <br />rom <br />you genera <br />e <br />a <br />a <br />' 18 flood in terms of a discharge rate is higher, even <br /> 19 though its total volume may be smaller. <br /> 20 So in terms of our choice of a flood <br /> 21 event, we believe we have been correct, and in terms <br /> 22 of what it is, is conservative in terms of what this <br /> 23 design does. We must remember that our design <br /> 24 i <br />i <br /> cr <br />ter <br />a know the entire facilities are based on a <br /> 25 100-year 24-hour precipitation event. - <br /> AGREN, BLANDO & BILLINGS <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.