Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />226 <br />' 1 was included, as in the amendment. We had <br /> 2 sufficient information for our own purposes to make <br /> 3 the assumptions that were necessary to define what <br />t 4 criteria we were going to use and what factors we <br /> 5 were going to put in our stability analysis. <br />' 6 As ongoing -- as an ongoing part c,f the <br /> 7 monitoring of the facility, there is a statement <br /> 8 that we will verify the physical properties of the <br /> 9 material in that particular foundation location. So <br />' 10 there are subse <br />o ahead and <br />uent raises before we <br /> q <br />g <br />' 11 do it. <br /> 12 There are a number of questions wh::ch <br />' 13 are related in terms of the double-liner system, the <br /> 14 leak detection system, and also the comments of" the <br /> 15 step back from a double-liner system from the heap <br /> 16 leach to the current design for a containment system <br /> 17 on the tailings. And I would like to just run <br />' 18 through that as, I think, one answer to all of those <br /> 19 points. <br />' 20 Firstly, as Dr. Smith has indicated <br /> 21 before he left, that in a heap leach facility ycou <br /> 22 are orchestrating the passage of Solution which is <br /> 23 essentially approximately 200 PPM of cyanide at a <br />' 24 pH level of approximately 10-1/2 to 11. <br /> 25 Your objective is to get solutions <br />' <br /> AGREN, BLANDO 6 BILLINGS <br /> <br />