Laserfiche WebLink
<br />lsa <br />1 party status to that hearing. <br /> 2 THE CHAIRMAN: That's what you are <br /> 3 tif <br />t <br />i <br />t <br />? <br /> es <br />y <br />ng now, as a par <br />y <br /> 4 MS. KIRCHER: Yes. Yes. <br /> 5 Okay. Phil Hocker told me the permit <br /> 6 application was not complete. The basis, the -- <br /> 7 furthermore, this is in addition to the reasons that <br />' 8 have previously been given. <br /> 9 There are no detailed designs of the <br /> l0 mill for us to evaluate. Therefore, we cannot <br /> 11 evaluate that the mill is of a safe design <br /> 12 t <br />ti <br /> cons <br />ruc <br />on. Battle Mountain Gold has stated that <br /> 13 there will be curbs inside of the mill. Curbs are <br /> 14 very easy to have holes broken into them and it's <br />' 15 also very easy for design flaw to allow for holes to <br /> 16 be left in it. <br /> 17 Concrete has a great potential for <br /> 18 cracking and heaving. We do not know if these <br /> 19 parameters have been addressed in the design <br /> 20 application for the mill. And these can onl;p be <br /> 21 i <br />i <br />' <br /> ascerta <br />ned <br />f we do look at the design for <br />the <br />' 2z mill. <br /> 23 The second item was, there is no plan <br /> 24 for post-reclamation fencing. The statute requires <br /> 25 that grating be (inaudible) until the area is <br /> <br /> AGREN, BLANDO & BILLINGS <br /> <br />1 <br />