Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br /> <br />' 1 UNIDENTIFIED PERSON: (Inaudible.) <br />199 <br /> 2 MR. SMITH: If you want me to proffer an <br />' 3 opinion on that basis, I will do it, in that if this <br />' 4 material was hazardous waste, I could understand an <br /> 5 argument being to require double liners. <br />' 6 Under my understanding of (inaudible) <br /> 7 and hazardous waste, then that's the sort of thing <br />' 8 the EPA would come and ask for. This isn't a <br /> 9 hazardous waste. <br />' <br /> 10 UNIDENTIFIED PERSON: Have there been <br /> 11 any geochemistry changes with this new amenoiment <br /> 12 that would alter anything the Board ought to be <br /> 13 considering, topsoil and re-vegetation? <br /> 14 MR. SMITH: Again, that's a bio<:hemist <br />t 15 thin <br />i <br />d I <br />th <br />t <br />N <br />t <br />I <br /> ssue an <br />am no <br />sure <br />can answer <br />a <br />. <br />o <br />g <br />' 16 changed inherently in the geochemistry, in my <br /> 17 opinion, that (inaudible), but I don't know from a <br />' 18 biochemist's point of view. <br /> 19 UNIDENTIFIED PERSON: Are you familiar <br />' 20 with the current permit -- I'm just curious. I want <br />' 21 to compare -- what the concentrations of cyanide <br /> 22 would be in the current heap leach-type situation as <br /> 23 opposed to the tailings in that leach situation? <br /> 24 MR. SMITH: The common level at which <br />' 25 you use cyanide in a heap leach, free cyanide on its <br />AGREN, BLANDO & BILLINGS <br />1 <br />