Laserfiche WebLink
' 174 <br /> <br /> 1 those were in place, what effect that would have on <br /> 2 th <br />ibl <br />b <br />i <br />? <br /> e poss <br />e em <br />ankment breach <br />ng <br />' 3 A If you were to have storm events that <br /> 4 were 100 years or less and if the diversion ditches <br />' S did not break down or breach and did not cause the <br /> 6 water to go into either the collection ponds or the <br />t 7 larger main embankment area, you are probably going <br />' 8 to be in pretty good shape. <br /> <br />9 - <br />If you start exceeding that 100-year - <br /> l0 even the submittal itself said for something larger <br /> 11 than the 100-year, it's been designed so the flow <br />' 12 would go into the embankment. <br /> 13 Now, I'm assuming that same rationale -- <br />' ' <br /> 14 it doesn <br />t say so on the submittal, but I am <br />' 15 assuming that same rationale holds true for the <br /> 16 collection ponds. It did not state that was what <br />' 17 would be happening, but that's the logical <br /> 18 assumption I made on that particular case. <br />t 19 S <br />if <br />i <br />th <br />ti <br />l <br /> you were <br />ar case, <br />o <br />n <br />at par <br />cu <br /> 20 to exceed the 100-year event, you would go and have <br /> 21 much more water going into the collection ponds and, <br />' 22 hence, if it was already full due to the tailings <br /> 23 waters coming into it, you would have a much greater <br />' 24 chance of overflowing and breaching over the <br /> 25 embankment itself. <br />' AGREN, BLANDO & BILLINGS <br /> <br />