Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br />' 1so <br />1 was listed? <br /> 2 MR. COHEN: No. The attachment to the <br /> 3 first letter is listed as an exhibit on our exhibit <br />' 4 list. <br /> 5 MR. MASSEY: The second letter, we <br />' 6 object to in its entirety. It's never seen the <br /> 7 light of day (inaudible). <br />' 8 THE CHAIRMAN: The second letter, I need <br /> 9 to clarify -- <br /> 10 UNIDENTIFIED PERSON <br />h <br /> : T <br />e January 24th. <br />' it MR. MASSEY: it's hard for me ~.o <br />' <br /> 12 identify it since I haven't seen it, but it <br />s the <br />' 13 subsequent letter. <br /> 14 UNIDENTIFIED PERSON: Mr. Chairman, I <br /> 15 guess you certainly have the authority to admit the <br /> 16 letter, and one way this might be handled is that <br /> 17 you can admit it, but the fact that it's hearsay <br /> 18 would go to the weight that the evidence is given. <br /> 19 <br /> THE CHAIRMAN: You had a response to <br />' 20 their objection? Somebody from your side did. <br /> 21 MR. COHEN: i do. Now that I understand <br /> 22 the objection, I have no dispute as to what Frank <br /> 23 described as to the effective hearsay. Hearsay is <br />' 24 admissible under the APA in these proceedings. <br /> 25 it doesn't necessarily require you to <br /> <br /> AGREN, BLANDO & BILLINGS <br /> <br />