My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1997-06-10_REVISION - M1981302 (7)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1981302
>
1997-06-10_REVISION - M1981302 (7)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/9/2022 4:18:02 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 10:27:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1981302
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
6/10/1997
Doc Name
DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED BY OBJECTING PARTIES TO THE DEEPE FARM PIT AMENDMENT APPLICATION DURING THE
From
DMG
To
GREGG SQUIRE
Type & Sequence
AM2
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
STATE OF COLOMDO <br /> DIVISION of MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br /> Denver,Co of do 801 Resources <br /> 1313 Sherman St., Room 215 <br /> Denver,Colorado 80203 <br /> Phone:(303)866-3567 <br /> FAX.13031 83_-8106 <br /> DEPARTMENT OF <br /> NATURAL <br /> DATE : June 5 , 1997 RESOURCES <br /> Roy Romer <br /> TO: File No. M-81-302 Govemor <br /> /1 Ea ec5 S.ive Direead <br /> ctor <br /> FROM: Allen Sorenson r[ly4'j E�ecmive Director <br /> Michael Long <br /> RE: Analysis of the Issues Raised by the City of BoulderDIWnDue,t", <br /> Correspondence Dated April 22, 1997, Western Mobile, <br /> Deeps Farm Pit, Permit No. M-81-302 <br /> In a letter dated 4/22/97, the City of Boulder objects to the <br /> changes in the Deepe Farm Pit reclamation plan proposed in the <br /> amendment application currently under review by the Division. The <br /> intent of this memorandum is to address the objections of the City <br /> of Boulder through technical and regulatory analysis . The City of <br /> Boulder states in the letter dated 4/22/97 that their objections <br /> "fall roughly into three categories : 1) The general pattern of <br /> digression away from the original intent of the reclamation plan <br /> for the Deepe Farm Pit mining site; 2) the impacts of the proposed <br /> reclamation amendment on City of Boulder Open Space properties; <br /> and, 3) the floodplain implications of the proposed amendment . " <br /> Each of these objections categories are analyzed separately below. <br /> ISSUE # 3 <br /> Digression from Original Reclamation Plan Intent <br /> Quotes pertinent to the City of Boulder' s concerns in this regard, <br /> from the letter dated 4/22/97 : <br /> . . . the City of Boulder is struck by the total disregard for <br /> previous reclamation commitments that the proposed amendment <br /> reflects . Substantially lower land grades, reduced surface <br /> water levels, and a demonstrated general lack of concern for <br /> impacts on neighboring land interests all suggest a change in <br /> the reclamation goals for the Deepe Farm Pit from one of <br /> wildlife protection and agriculture purposes to reclamation <br /> goals which are more suited to future land development <br /> purposes . <br /> We only hope the Colorado Division of Minerals and Geology <br /> (DMG) recognizes that the credibility of future commitments to <br /> mining reclamation standards, and the willingness of local <br /> governments to grant future mining permits, depends on the <br /> reliability of previous reclamation plans . <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.