My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2007-07-31_REVISION - M1997065
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1997065
>
2007-07-31_REVISION - M1997065
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 6:08:12 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 10:27:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1997065
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
7/31/2007
Doc Name
Adequacy Review
From
DRMS
To
Stone Wholesale Corporation
Type & Sequence
CN1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
5. The applicant states that there is no way to tell how many acres will require topsoil replacement and <br />revegetation efforts. The applicant will need to estimate the acreage of affected land (as noted above), so it <br />can be property accounted for in the reclamation cost estimate. <br />6. The applicant states that the stockpile on the northeast comer of the site will be reclaimed and meet the <br />standards of Rule 6. The applicant will need to provide a more specific reclamation plan for the waste pile. <br />For example, will the pile be returned to the pit (as previously stated by the applicant), or left in place? If the <br />pile is left in place, the applicant will need to provide engineered designs for placement of the fill pile and <br />provide a geotechnical stability exhibit as required by Rule 6.5 of the Construction Material Rules and <br />Regulations. <br />7. Please estimate the amount of fill that will be added to the existing piles during the life of the mine. <br />Under Rule 3.2(7) the Division is required to conduct an inspection prior to Board consideration. The Division <br />will schedule an inspection prior to the decision date. Additional questions may arise as a result of the inspection. <br />Please be advised that the Brownstone Quarry Conversion Application may be deemed inadequate, and the <br />application may be denied on August 13, 2007 unless the above-mentioned adequacy review items are addressed <br />to the satisfaction of the Division. If you feel more time is needed to complete your reply, the Division can grant <br />an extension to the decision date. This will be done upon receipt of a written waiver of your right to a decision by <br />August 13, 2007 and request for additional time. This must be received no later than the deadline date. <br />If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. <br />Sinc y, <br />S~ <br />Erica Crosby <br />Environmental Protection Specialist <br />cc: Carl Mount; DRMS <br />Vic Norris <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.