Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br /> <br />II <br />L~ <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />20 BIOLOGICAL REPORT 85(1.23) <br />resistant to 65 mg KCN/L at low temperatures <br />(13° C) than were seedlings from cold-susceptible <br />cultivars (25° C), as judged by respiratory activity <br />of mitochondria (Van De Venter 1985). Results <br />suggest that cyanide-resistant respiration may <br />play a role in cold resistance in maize seedlings, al- <br />though more evidence is needed to demonstrate <br />that cold-resistant plants actually use their <br />greater potential for alternative respiration at ]ow <br />temperatures (Van De Venter 1985). <br />The c}•anogenic system comprising cyano- <br />genic glycosides, cyanohydrins, betaglucosidases, <br />and nitrile ]yases is widespread in plants, but also <br />occurs in several species of arthropods, including <br />the tiger beetle (Megacephala oirginica), leaf bee- <br />tle (Paropsis atomaria ), zygaenid moths, and cer- <br />tain butterflies (Nahrstedt 1988). In Zygaeea <br />trifolii, cyanide compounds seem to function as <br />protection against predators (Nahrstedt 1988). De- <br />fensive secretions of cyanide have also been re- <br />ported in polydesmid millipedes, and these <br />organisms seem to be more tolerant than other <br />species when placed in killing jars containing HCN <br />(Towill et al. 1978). In a millipede (Aphelaria sp.), <br />cyanide is generated in atwo-compartment organ <br />by hydrolysis of mandelonitrile; cyanide genera- <br />tion occurs outside the gland when the components <br />ofthe two compartments are mixed duringejection <br />(Towill et al. 1978). <br />Highly toxic substances, such as c}•anides, are <br />sometimes feeding cues and stimulants for special- <br />ized insects. For example, instar larvae of the <br />southern armyworm (Spodoptera erid¢nia) <br />strongly prefer cyanogenic foods, such as foliage of <br />the lima bean, a plant with comparatively elevated <br />cyanide content-up to 31 mg/kg in some varie- <br />ties-in the form of linamurin (Brattsten et al. <br />1963). Feeding was stimulated in southern ar- <br />myworms at dietary levels up to 508 mg KCN/kg <br />(208 mg HCN/kg) for first to fourth instar larval <br />stages, and between 1,000 and 10,000 mg IiCN/kg <br />diet for fifth and sixth instar larvae (Brattsten et <br />-al. 1983). Sixth instar larvae preexposed to diets <br />containing 5,000 mg KCN/kg showed no adverse <br />affects at dietary levels of 10,000 mg KCN/kg; how- <br />ever, previously unexposed larvae showed revers- <br />ible signs of poisoning at 10,000 mg/l:g diet, <br />including complete inhibition of oviposition and <br />8390 reduction in adult emergence (Brattsten et al. <br />1983). Experimental studies with southern ar- <br />myworm larvae and thiocyanate~ne of the in <br />t~vo cyanide metabolites-showed that 5,000 mg <br />thioc}•anate per kilogram diet reduced pupation by <br />779e, completely inhibited oviposition, and re- <br />duced adult emergence by 8090 (Brattsten et al. <br />1983), strongly suggesting that thiocyanate poi- <br />soning isthe primary effect of high dietary cyanide <br />levels in southern arm}tivorms. <br />Resistant species, such as southern ar- <br />myworms, require injected doses up to 800 mg <br />KCN/kg BW (332 mg HCN/kg BW) or diets of <br />3,600 mg KCN/kg for 5090 mortalit}• (Brattsten et <br />al. 1983), but data are scarce for other terrestrial <br />invertebrates. Exposure to 8 mg HCN/L air inhib- <br />its respiration in the granary weevil (Sitophilus <br />granaries) within 15 min and ki115 509n in 4 h; <br />some weevils recover after cessation of 4-h expo- <br />sure (Towill et al. 1978). <br />Aqu¢tic Organr:sms <br />Numerous accidental spills of sodium cyanide <br />or potassium cyanide into rivers ands streams have <br />resulted in massive kills of fishes, amphibians, <br />aquatic insects, and aquatic vegetation; sources of <br />poisonings were storage reservoirs o(con centrated <br />solutions, overturned rail tank cars, or discharge <br />of substances generating Tree HCN in the water <br />from hydrolysis or decomposition (Leduc 1984). <br />Data on the recovery of poisoned ecosystems are <br />scarce. In one case, a large amount gfc}•anide-con- <br />tainingslag entered a stream from the reservoir of <br />a Japanese gold mine as a result of An earthquake <br />(Yasuno et al. 1981). The slag covered the <br />streambed for about 10 km from the point of rup- <br />ture, killing all stream biota; cyanide was detected <br />in the water column for only 3 days after the spill. <br />Within 1 month flora w•as established on the silt <br />covering the above-water stones, but there was lit- <br />tle underwater growth. After 6-7 months, popula- <br />tions of fish, algae, and invertebrates had <br />recovered, although species compo6ition of algae <br />was altered (Yasuno et al. 1981). <br />Fish were the most sensitive Aquatic organ- <br />isms tested under controlled conditions. Signifi- <br />cant adverse nonlethal effects, including reduced <br />swimming performance and inhibited reproduc- <br />tion, were observed in the range of 5.0-7.2 µg free <br />cyanide per liter; deaths were recorded for most <br />species between 20 and 76 µg/L (Table 3). Among <br />invertebrates, adverse nonlethal effects were <br />documented between 18 and 43 µg/I„ and lethal ef- <br />fects between 30 and 100 µg/I~although some <br />deaths were recorded in the range 3-7 µg/L for the <br />amphipod Gammarua pulcx (Table 3). Algae and <br />macrophytes were comparatively tolerant; adverse <br />effects were reported at >160 µg free cyanide per <br />liter (Table 3). <br />