Laserfiche WebLink
Sent By: Klauzer &Tremaine, LLC; <br />970 979 1131; <br />Aug-28-03 9:22AM; <br />~,, <br />Randall W Klauzer <br />M4m}lCr. CO~OYedn HBC <br />J. Richard Tremaine <br />Membu, Colorado, D.C~ and Virginia Bura <br />KL.A.UZER & TREMAINE, LLC <br />Attorneys at Law <br />P.O. aox 774525, Stcam6uat Springs, Cnlocadn 80477 <br />320 Lincoln Avcnuc -Second r'loof <br />Phnne:(97U)879-5003 Fax: (970) 879-1131 <br />ktlaw cqm <br />August 27, 2003 <br />VIA FACSIMILE (303) 832-810G <br />State of Colorado <br />Division of Minerals and Geology <br />Allen: Tom Sclu-iener <br />1313 Sherman St., Room 215 <br />Denver, CO 80203 <br />Dear Mr. Schriencr: <br />Re: Labarge <br />Page 2/3 <br />Claire E. Sollars <br />Mombvr. Colorado end Wyoming Bari <br />Jamcg "Sandy" Homer <br />Arem6ar, Colorado and Wyoming Bare <br />This letter is a follow rlp to the conversation you had today with my paralegal, Karen Dierkes, <br />regarding the pre-hearing set for August 28, 2003. My interpretation of the package I received <br />front you with respect to the hearing is that this was a mattei between the applicant and the State. <br />To be notified today that you are expecting myself and my client to be present at a heazing <br />scheduled for tomorrow did not allow us the opportunity to make arrangements to attend this <br />hearing. Therefore, as Ms. Dicrkcs explained to you today, we will not be able to attend the <br />hearing on August 28, 2003. <br />!n addition, as Ms. Dierkes mentioned to you today, l received a copy of the LaFazge response <br />on August 25, 2003 which i have not had the opportunity to review as of this date. <br />Your package to me discussing the pre-hearing did not specifically state our presence was <br />needed nor requited. I understand from Ms. Dierkes, that it is your position that our absence <br />from this pre-hearing may cause my client to be dismissed from this proceeding. This result <br />would be unfair and inappropriate, since the objections raised were related to deficiencies in the <br />Labarge application, and my client's concern as nn adjacent property owner. <br />Unfortunately, i have the following commitments tomorrow: <br />- court hearing in the morning <br />- major real estate closing; and <br />-special district boazd meeting tomorrow evening. <br />The combination of these commitments precludes me From being able to artcnd your hearing or <br />provide a more detailed response at this time. <br />7~ ~p>ye ~ Ja.~ <br />Co~~p''y~t~~o~client. A D <br />