Laserfiche WebLink
Sorenson, Allen <br /> ~ <br />From: Sorenson, Allen ~ ~q~}q OoZ- ' <br />Sent: W ednesday, November 03, 2004 4:50 PM <br />' <br />' T R ~ O "f <br />Celina Akin <br />To: <br /> <br />Cc: Crosby, Erica 1 <br />"6~wL ~~ NJ,MGr. G <br />jv~G <br />r <br />Subject: RE: TR-04 NPLS and EWIS, etc. . <br />iQ <br />e(5 <br /> ~. <br />~n <br />Qf~-Lec~ L~e~ <br /> / <br />L <br />Celina, one more thing: //~3'~7 / <br /> A~5 ti5~ / <br />Also, by making the NPL Xl, the value of N increases by one and changes the critical value <br />Q (from the chart). <br />-Allen <br />-----Original Message----- <br />From: Sorenson, Allen <br />Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2004 4:26 PM <br />To: 'Celina Akin' <br />Cc: Crosby, Erica <br />Subject: RE: TR-04 NPLS and EWIS, etc. <br />Celina, you are correct. The NPL is X1 and the highest value in the acceptable data set is <br />X2 in the Dixon equation. My mistake was in looking at the second number in the <br />acceptable data set as X2, which is wrong. <br />Thanks for picking that up. <br />-Allen <br />-----Original Message----- <br />From: Celina Akin [mailto:cakinpamericansoda.com] <br />Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2004 2:49 PM <br />To: 'Sorenson, Allen' <br />Subject: RE: TR-Q4 NPLS and EWIS, etc. <br />Allen, <br />I believe that I know the answer to this question but I wanted to confirm <br />with you just in case I am off base. <br />In your example that you sent me using the 21-3U Boron baseline data, you <br />rejected the high data point value of 7 mg/L and moved to the next point of <br />3.2 mg/L which was an acceptable data point from the criteria of the Dixon <br />calculations. When you gave the example of solving the Dixon calculation <br />for NPL you used 3.12 as in Q=0.546=(NPL-3.12)/(NPL-2.8)instead of 3.2 as <br />shown here Q=0.546=(NPL-3.2)/(NPL-2.8) I have established a spreadsheet t0 <br />automatically run through these calculations for me and I am prepared to <br />generate the graphs showing the NPL and EWI levels but I believe that you <br />meant to use 3.2 instead of 3.12 since that is the highest acceptable data <br />value. <br />Please confirm this and if I am incorrect I will modify my spreadsheet prior <br />to running them. <br />Thanks, <br />Celina <br />-----Original Message----- <br />From: Sorenson, Allen [mailto:allen.sorenson~state.co.us] <br />Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2004 8:37 PM <br />To: 'cakin®americansoda.com' <br />1 <br />