2006-10-03_REVISION - M1977439

• Permit No: M1977439
• IBM Index Class Name: Revision
• Doc Date: 10/3/2006
• Doc Name: Adequacy Review-Fax
• From: DRMS
• To: Lafarge West Inc
• Type & Sequence: AM3
• Media Type: D
• Archive: No

STATE OF COLORADO
DIVISION OF RECLAMATION, MINING AND SAFETY
Department of Natural Resources
1313 Sherman St., Room 215
Denver, Colorado 80203
Phone: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
October 3, 2006
Mr. Eric Reckentine
Lafarge West, Inc.
1800 North Taft Hill Road
Fort Collins, Colorado 80522
COLORADO
DIVISION O F
RECLAMATION
MINING
- &-
SAEETY
BiII Owens
Governor
Russell George
Executive Director
Ronald W. Cattany
DIYi$ion Director
Natural Resource Trustee
RE: Adequacy Review, Ameudment No. AM-03, Home Office Mine, Permit No. M-1977-439
Dear Mr. Reckentine,
Listed below are adequacy review comments for Amendment No. AM-03 for the Home Office Mine, Permit
No. M-1977-439. The Division of Reclamation, Mining and Safety (Division) is required to make an approval
or denial decision no later than October 5, 2006, therefore, your response to the following adequacy review
concerns should be submitted to the Division as soon as possible.
Rule 1.6.2(11(gl -General Apnlicant Procedures
In accordance with this rule, please submit proof of the public notices submitted to al] owners of record of
surface lands, easement holders, and owners of record of surface lands that aze within 200 feet of the
boundary of affected land. Proof of Notice may be satisfied by submitting return receipts of a Certified
Mailing or by proof of personal service.
Rule 6.2.1(2 (b) 1-Maps and Exhibits
In accordance with this rule, maps, with the exception of the index map, must be prepared and signed by a
registered land surveyor, professional engineer, or other qualified person. Please resubmit signed copies of
Exhibit C-4, Mining Plan Map, and Exhibit F, Reclamation Plan Map.
Rule 6.4.3 Exhibit C -Pre-Mining and Mining Plan Map(sl of Affected Lands
3. In accordance with Rule 6.4.3(d), please modify Exhibit C-4, Mining Plan, to include the silt storage area.
Rule 6.4.4 Exhibit D - Minin>? Plan
4. In Exhibit D, Mining Plan, the applicant states that the berm which separated the Seaworth Parcel from the
Taft Hill Expansion Pit was mined through but subsequently reconstructed. Please demonstrate to the
Division that the reconstructed berm is, and will be, geotechnically stable under current and final
Office of Office of
Mined Land Reclamation - Active and Inactive Mines