My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1993-11-10_REVISION - M1988112
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1988112
>
1993-11-10_REVISION - M1988112
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/20/2021 10:44:12 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 9:26:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1988112
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
11/10/1993
Doc Name
FAX COVER
From
DMG
To
ROGER FLYNN
Type & Sequence
AM1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />MINfi ID: M-77-001 <br />INSPECTION DATE: 10/15/93 <br />(Page 2 b) <br />INSP&CTOR'S INITIALS: LDO <br />September 30, 1993 <br />In response to Jim Dillie's questions about installation of the synthetic liner Mr. Guyer <br />stated that only 15 patches in a 24 acre area were necessary after rocks were located under <br />installed sections. Mr. Guyer described preparation of the compacted soil liner. Truck <br />dumped material is dozed to a rough grade, after the sub grade has been scarified with a <br />sheepa foot roller. A vibrating smooth drum roller compacts the material. It ie then graded <br />with a road grader and rolled again with a smooth drum roller. Rocks at the surface are <br />picked out by Serrot crews and the Bite ie inspected by both himself and BMRI before final <br />acceptance by BMRI. Mr. Guyer signs acceptance of the installed synthetic liner each day <br />only after he has personally inspected it and checked the contractors quality control. BMRI <br />inspects the synthetic liner and signs acceptance of sections that pass. <br />BMRI said liner installation should be complete by October 20, 1993 and the entire Phase II <br />project including Raise I should be completed by November 15th. Of the 59 acres to be done, <br />34 acres have been completed. <br />The soil materials borrow area was inspected. The north side of the pit was visited. The <br />material appeared to be relatively free of rocks. Material in this portion of the pit was <br />used for compacted soil liner, Any rocks that were found were weakly cemented sandstone and <br />broke down to sandy material easily. Upon wetting and rubbing the borrow material <br />Larry Oehler noted that it contained a fair amount of fines including some clay. Ms. Scott <br />stated that a specific borrow site was not stated in the permit for the liner and drain layer <br />materials. <br />A large stockpile of material from the West Pit stockpiled for Raise I was observed. It was <br />located in the east end of the tailings reservoir area and would have tc be moved to the <br />raise before the liner can be completed. <br />The first 10 ft. of the embankment raise had been installed at the time o:f the inspection. <br />Consolidation plates were in place beneath the raise as required by the Division. Glen Guyer <br />stated that the raise had been constructed in three lifts of 4 ft., 3 ft. ar.~d 3 ft., and that <br />construction had been completed on September 11, 1993. <br />The borrow material used to construct the first 10 ft. of Raise I contains :onsiderably more <br />than 103 fines. SRK drawing 14719-102 submitted with the San Luie Mine Phase II, Raise I <br />Design Report and received by the Division July 14, 1993, indicates that the entirety of <br />Raise I would be constructed of Type 1 material. One of the gradation specifications for <br />Type 1 material is <10~ fines. This specification is included both in the 1993 design report <br />and in the 1989 amendment approved by the Division. <br />The original approved design for Raise I is a zoned raise consisting of Type 1 material faced <br />on the upstream aide with Type 2 material. The zoned embankment raise ie illustrated in SRK <br />drawing no. 14705-104 submitted with the 1989 amendment. This is the configuration that the <br />Division would consider the approved design, because a raise lacking the Type 2 facing would <br />not have filter compatibility with the tailings. <br />As any case, the first 10 ft. of the embankment raise was not constructed in accordance with <br />designs approved by the Division. <br />October 1, 1993 <br />The inspectors spent several hours inspecting and observing installation of the compacted <br />soil liner, the synthetic liner, the drain pipe system and the drainage blanket. Mr. Guyer <br />explained construction and QAQC for each of these items. All four inspectors were very <br />satisfied with compaction and final preparation of the soil liner as well a~e installation of <br />the synthetic (VLDPS) liner. Allen Sorenson and Bill York-Feirn observed permeability <br />testing of the compacted soil liner and were satisfied with the procedure. These <br />permeabilities are running in the range of 10~ to 10~. It appears that the synthetic liner <br />ie being installed to specifications with very good quality control in locating and patching <br />holes and seaming and testing seams. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.