Laserfiche WebLink
Page 1 of 1 <br />Crosby, Erica <br />From: Humphries, Bruce <br />Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2005 12:18 PM <br />To: Crosby, Erica <br />Subject: FW: Gold Basin Mine <br />Fi~E Vt:R- <br />I need to discuss this with you before (respond -thanks <br />-----Original Message----- <br />From: ]im VanElla [mailto:goldbasin@hotmail.com] <br />Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2005 11:09 AM <br />To: bruce.humphries@state.co.us <br />Subject: Gold Basin Mine <br />I wonder if you could explain to me if I am understanding it correctly. The Rule 1, 1.1 <br />defination of regulations under number 4 "Affected Lands" (All lands shall be excluded that <br />would be otherwise included-that reads affected lands shall not include off-site roads which <br />exist prior to the date on which notice was given or permit application) <br />Our situation is this...our permit area is 2.8 acres and we set the markers at 3.8 acres <br />allowing 1 acre for access roads in to and to cross the effected area or boundry area and to <br />be able to service the rest of our 160 acres. When you check it with a GPS such as Erica <br />Crosby did it puts us 1 acre over our 2.8 acre permit which makes us inviolation of our <br />contract. <br />Since you can't mine an existing access road, we feel we may not have to amend our <br />permit. It is not a good time to do the paper work because of Jim's illness. <br />Please give us your opinion. <br />Deanna Van Ella <br />Find files on vour PC instantly with the new MSN Toolbar Suite beta -FREE! <br />~~ ~~ ~- <br />~` <br />~~~~ ~~ <br />3/15/2005 <br />