Laserfiche WebLink
more solid proof of stability than any possible equation could show. <br />Other Areas <br />6. Response adequate. <br />Topsoil and overburden will be directly used for reclamation purposes and not stockpiled. <br />If excess overburden or topsoil is encountered it will be added to the existing stockpiles. <br />8. The lake divider has been substantially reduced in width on the maps. This reduction in <br />width will more than account for the required fill needed for the divider. The north-south <br />aligned slope bordering the Loughery house will be filled using either overburden from <br />future mining or from the overburden stockpile. The overburden stockpile has an <br />approximate surplus of 4,000 CYD. The approximate fill required for the slope is 3,000 <br />CYD. <br />9. Response adequate. <br />10. See comment no. 5 above. <br />1 L It should be noted that none of the river stabilization structures lie within the permit azea. <br />They are being installed by the landowner for bank protection. Therefore, none of the <br />structures fall under DMG jurisdiction. <br />12. United Companies commits to either applying for a bond recalculation to include the cost <br />of filling the additional lake azea or showing an approved augmentation plan. Current <br />calculations show approximately 0.75 acres of exposure credit remaining assuming the <br />replacement of the lake divider. This area will yield approximately 30,000 CYD of <br />material. <br />13. Maps have been updated. <br />14. Spacing has been reduced to 10 foot centers. <br />15. As discussed prior to submission of adequacy response #2, this adequacy response <br />primarily addresses only AM-3. The additional information, such as a revised <br />revegetation plan, address portions of previous AM's, TR's and the original permit which <br />have been deemed inappropriate such as mssian olive included in the original seeding <br />plan. <br />