My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2003-09-29_REVISION - M1977378
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1977378
>
2003-09-29_REVISION - M1977378
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 5:46:08 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 9:07:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977378
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
9/29/2003
Doc Name
Operation of Water Treatment Plant and Reclamation o f5.67 acres of the Herbert Placer
From
Gold King Mines Corporation
To
DMG
Type & Sequence
AM5
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
57
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
COLORADO DEPARTMENT OFPUtc.ICHEALTHAND ENVIRONMENT, Water ~iualiry Control Division <br />Rationale -Page 8, CO-0027529 <br />C. Colorado Deparhnent of Public Health and Environment, Water Quality Control Commission. Regulation No. 62 <br />ReAUlations for E/lZuem Limitations (5 CCR 1002-62). Denver: CDPHE, as revised 11 /9/98 and effective <br />12/30/98. <br />D. Colorado Deparhnent of Public Health and Environment, Water Quality Control Commission. Regulation No. 61 <br />Colorado Discharge Permit System Rexu[ations. (5 CCR 1002-61). Denver: CDPHE, as revised 3/9/99 and <br />effective 4/30/99. <br />E. Colorado Department of Public Health and Environmem, Water Quality Control Commission. Regulation No. 39 <br />Colorado River Salinity Standards (5 CCR 1002-39). Denver: CDPHE, as revised 7/14/97and effective 8/30/97. <br />F. U. S, Government, Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration. Code of Federal <br />ReRulafians (Part 440). Washington: 1998. <br />VIII. PUBLIC NOTICE COMMENTS <br />Comments were received from the Environmental Protection Agerscy concerning the following: "Since these are "major" <br />facilities, the permits should require reporting of compliance monitoring results to EPA on a DMR farm as well as the <br />reporting to the State already, in the permit. " <br />The Division considered the changes requested and concluded that this permit already states that a copy of the DMR be sent <br />the EPA in Part LE.1. of the permit. This was later verified with the EPA. <br />Christopher L. Gates <br />May 9, 2001 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.