My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2006-05-31_REVISION - M1978056 (10)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1978056
>
2006-05-31_REVISION - M1978056 (10)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/16/2021 6:02:53 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 9:03:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1978056
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
5/31/2006
Doc Name
Adequacy Response
From
Varra Companies Inc.
To
DMG
Type & Sequence
TR2
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
74
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Varra Companies, Inc. <br />8120 Cmee Slrcet Frederick. CO 80516 Telephone (3031666.6657 Fax (303)666-6743 <br />Tuesday 30 May 2006 <br />Thomas A. Schreiner RECEIVED <br />Enviromnental Protection Specialist MAY 3 1 2006 <br />Colorado Division of Minerals and Geology <br />Office of Mined Land Reclamation Bivisian ~f Minerals and Gealuay <br />1313 Sherman Street, Room 215 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />Subject: DMG Permit M1978-056 -Durham Sand & Gravel Pit <br />Technical Revision 2 -Reply to DMG correspondence of . <br />Dear Tom: <br />Consistent with your request of 11 January 2006, please find correspondence and <br />attachments from Bruce Erickson, P.E. of 17 May 2006 addressing final <br />reclamation costs. His sum of $ 157,312.50 when combined with that of Exhibit L <br />- Warranty Information from the approved amendment, or $ 90,283.52; should <br />bring the combined financial warranty to $ 247,596.02. <br />Also enclosed, find the final grading plan of Apri12006 from Anderson Consulting <br />Engineers; and the CGRS Stability Analysis Report of 17 May 2006. This <br />information should satisfy the final concerns expressed by the Division, showing <br />that the existing berm is stable, no significant subsidence of the existing berm <br />would occur after a flood event, and that the planned final grading will not <br />adversely impact bank stability of the berm. <br />The information as provided should allow the Division to approve the Technical <br />Revision. Thank-you again for your assistance. <br />Sincerely, <br />Vama Companies, Inc. <br />F,G <br />r ord Janes <br />Forester <br />r crow ir. - ___. <br />Class: "'~ Type-Seq.: - <br />From: To: ,(~~/: <br />Doc. Name Dn.rn.ocu ~+ .rte <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.