Laserfiche WebLink
u, <br />N 208,000 <br />N 207 <br />i <br />PERL41T <br />IOUNDARY <br />0 <br />0 <br />y <br />_ <br />0 <br />0 <br />0 0 <br />204951.3 <br />N <br />N <br />N N <br />8610.9 <br />w wl 11i w <br />PROCESS FACILITIES <br />00 NOa�N °alt <br />00 <br />00 i <br />N 206,000 <br />i <br />� o <br />4 <br />a 0 <br />0 <br />N N <br />w w <br />TOPSOIL <br />STOCKPILE <br />0� <br />/ 4 <br />/ °�1N, <br />r <br />EAST <br />DIKE <br />EXISTING <br />ANCHOR <br />TdiEP'CH <br />7 <br />t <br />IL <br />TOCKPILE/ <br />IT <br />F. <br />I / <br />SEE DETAIL 1 <br />8 \/ \ <br />CHANNEL REQUIREMENTS <br />REACH <br />MIN CONTROL <br />POINT ELEV. <br />APPROX. C D,11 ATES <br />OF COLIIROL POINTS <br />CHANNEL SLOPE <br />RANGE <br />1 <br />8601.8 <br />2038580.3 <br />204951.3 <br />0.5 - <br />1.0 <br />2 <br />8610.9 <br />2039962.6 <br />205054.1 <br />0.5 - <br />1.0 <br />3 <br />8609.6 <br />2040113.2 <br />205499.0 <br />0.45 - <br />1.0 <br />4 <br />8606.1 <br />2040678.8 <br />207425.0 <br />0.35 - <br />1.0 <br />5 <br />VARIABLE <br />NA <br />0.5 - <br />1.0 <br />6 <br />VARIABLE <br />NA <br />DESCRIPTION <br />0.5 - <br />1.0 <br />7 <br />8593.3 <br />203814.4 <br />206264.5 <br />0.75 - <br />1.0 <br />NOTES: <br />1) CONTOURS ARE BASED ON PRELIMINARY ESTIMATES OF <br />POST OPERATION SURFACE. ACTUAL SURFACE SHOULD <br />HAVE A SHAPE WHICH PRODUCES SIMILAR DRAINAGE PATHS. <br />2) MINIMUM CONTROL POINT ELEVATIONS FOR REACHES <br />1 THROUGH 4 ARE DITCH INVERT ELEVATIONS FOR <br />LOCATIONS WHERE THE CHANNEL ENTERS THE FACILITY. <br />3) MWIMU" CONTROL POINT ELEVATIONS ARE BASED ON A <br />0.5% SLOPE FROM THE DRAINAGE BASIN TO THE SPILLWAY <br />INVERT ELEVATION. THE COORDINATES LISTED ABOVE ARE <br />APPROXIMATE AND SHALL BE BASED ON NATURAL DRAINAGES <br />FROM BASINS A THROUGH D. A 0.5% SLOPE MUST BE <br />MAINTAINED IF THE CONTROL POINTS CHANGE. <br />4) THE CONTROL POINT FOR REACH 7 IS APPROXIMATE. <br />IF THE LOCATION VARIES, A 0.75% SLOPE MUST BE <br />MAINTAINED FOR REACH 7. <br />5) CHANNEL SLOPE RANGES SHOULD BE MAINTAINED WITHIN <br />THE IMPOUNDMENT AND OUTSIDE THE PERIMETER BERM <br />A MINIMUM OF 50 ft. <br />6) THE SPILLWAY IS A COMPOSITE OVERFLOW / CHANNEL <br />SECTION. THE SPILLWAY CONTROL ELEVATION IS AT THE <br />TOP OF THE CHANNEL.(8590') <br />7) INITIALLY THE CHANNEL WILL NOT BE CUT THROUGH <br />THE SPILLWAY AND THE SECTION WILL ACT AS A <br />NON- OVERFLOW SECTION AT ELEVATION 8590. SEE SECTION C -C'. <br />8) SECTIONS AND DETAILS ARE LOCATED ON DRAWING 2, SPILLWAY <br />DETAILS AND PROFILE ARE LOCATED ON DRAWING 3. <br />9) SEE DRAWING 3 FOR ENLARGED SPILLWAY CHANNEL PLAN, <br />SPILLWAY CONTROL TABLE, AND CURVE TABLE. <br />RECEIVED <br />N JUT_ 1 10 <br />l t Division of Minerals a ueology <br />200 100 0 II' 200 400 <br />SCALE IN FEET <br />PREPARED FOR: PREPARED BY; <br />BATTLE MOUNTAIN <br />RESOURCES, INC. STEFFEN ROBERTSON & ffiRSTEN (U.S.) <br />SAN LUIS PROJECT Consulting EngNeers a Scientists <br />TITLE: SCALE: AS SHOWN <br />DRAWING No: <br />TAILINGS IMPOUNDMENT <br />RECLAMATION PLAN DRAWING i AA <br />0 0 0 1 2 2 7 4 <br />REVISION <br />PROJECT No.: 14732 <br />DESIGNED <br />KS <br />05/97 <br />O <br />z <br />DRAWN <br />TH <br />06/97 <br />¢ <br />CHECKED <br />DH <br />06/97 <br />u <br />Lu <br />APPROVED <br />DH <br />06/97 <br />¢ <br />APPROVED <br />No. <br />DESCRIPTION <br />BY <br />DATE <br />A <br />ISSUED FOR CLIENT REVIEW <br />DH <br />6/97 <br />z <br />z <br />O <br />Q <br />Permit Number oZ- <br />tn <br />W <br />Q <br />Class: OPennn <br />Section/Exhibit: t�- <br />�L_. � -7 ._._._._._._._._._._._ <br />! class: evision i <br />_ Type/S_�._._._. <br />Class: O Report O Hydro OGene -mi <br />Doc Type_ ©AC1_kw�a�+T° -___- _______ <br />El (Coal only) O Bond D Enforcement D Inspection <br />0 0 0 1 2 2 7 4 <br />