Laserfiche WebLink
03/1112003 13:19 9707253303 <br />GRAND CO BUILDING DP <br />PAGE 07 <br />Environment and I?ivision of Mineral and Geology have a Memorandum of Understanding <br />requiring that mines and thew associated uses are and will be maintained in substantive compliance <br />with public health and environmental regulations. In addition, Grand County permits landfdls only <br />after special review and approval by the Board of Couny Commissioners (Section XI, 11.1 (2), <br />11.2, 11.3 and 11.4, Grand County Zoning Regulations). In addition, 1041 Authority grants the <br />County the ability to adopt regulations specifically for landfills and this action maybe considered <br />by Grand County to ensure eavirormiental impacts of this use is properly mitigated. On a regional <br />level, the landfills would also have to comply with 208 Water Quality Requiremem. The County <br />will also require a Certificate of Designation authorizing the new landfill. <br />The County believes that the Compacry has been utilizing the .17 acre landfill site with no <br />oversight as to the material beit4g deposited. Grand County and the State have ao records that the <br />standard soil and water quality monitoring tests, specifically related to landfills, are being <br />performed. No analysis is provided that reveals that the landfills are structurally or <br />environmentally feasible, which only raises issues, concerns and questions. Are the soils and <br />geology appropriate for the landfills? Is a liner being proposed with the new landfill and what <br />type? What types and amounts of materials will be landtilled? Will proper capping methods be <br />followed at the time of closure? Are proper leaching co~rols being implemented? Are monitoring <br />wells being proposed below both of the landfills? Is there a 30 year post closure financial <br />obligation being required? The latter is particularly importarR because it is a mandatory post <br />closure requirement. TR-12 should not be considered until a detailed feasibility study which <br />addresses the water quality, structural, operational and financial issues which may arise because of <br />this scenario is submitted for review. In addition, TR-12 should not be gives further consideration <br />until local ]and use approvals and permits are granted, and the land511s are in substantive <br />compliance with applicable State public health and environme~ut regulations, as required by the <br />Memorandum of Understanding. <br />The Company agreed to comply with all necessary permitting applicable to <br />landfds and process the currently proposed Technical Revision as a Permit <br />Amendment for the new 7.5 acre landfill. The new landfill does require <br />Certificate of Designation by Grand County and an approved special use <br />permit At the time the new landfill Amendment is to be considered the <br />Company will provide a feasibility study, which addresses the water quality, <br />structural, operational and financial issues, design and engineering, a geo- <br />technical analysis and other support documentation (i.e., a 30 year post <br />closure plan). It is proposed Chat the eaiafing .17 acre landfill continue to be <br />utilized as part of reclamation. Grand County, nor the State of Colorado <br />have record that this landfill is in substantive compliance with public health <br />and environmental regulations, It must be required of the Company that <br />they provide the State of Colorado and Grand County with evidence that the <br />.17 acre landfill is in substantive compliance as required. <br />At some point in the not too distant future the Company will close the site due to mine <br />Page 6 of 9 <br />