Laserfiche WebLink
Topper Objection <br />Amendment No.l - Jeronimus Property <br />Petmit # M-99-034 <br />lakes aze partially dewatered, this will lower the water table in the surrounding alluvial aquifer. A <br />lowered water table reduces the efficiency of my well's production and increases my pumping costs. <br />If water levels in the lakes are reduced significantly, the resulting water level decline in the <br />surrounding aquifer may be such that my well would go dry when pumped. A decline of the natural <br />water table produced by actions of the applicant would result in injury to my decreed water right in <br />the irrigation well and the other exempt alluvial well. The applicant provides no hydrologic <br />assessment ofthe potential impact to surrounding structures from dewatering ofihe pit lakes. <br />In pazagraph 4 of the mining notes and restrictions of Exhibit C-2 it is stated "Topsoil and <br />overburden stockpiles that aze temporarily stored on site..., have a maximum height of 30',..." Item <br />#6 on page 3 of Exhibit D of the permit application also addresses topsoil and overburden excavation <br />and stockpiling. In this item, stockpiles are cited to be a maximum of 20' in height. Cleazly, there is <br />a 10-foot discrepancy between these two documents. The height of stockpiles will influence their <br />runoff and erosion, slope stability, airborne particulate generation, and creation of visual <br />obstructions.- Interested parties cannot articulate.objections 1o a mining plan-when that plan contains <br />factual inconsistencies. <br />My concerns regazding water quality include remobilization ofexisting contaminants, herbicide <br />application, vehiculaz/equipment spills, and inadequate permit compliance. The Henderson azea of <br />Adams County is within a ground water contaminant plume attributed to historical waste disposal <br />practices at the Rocky Mountain Arsenal. The azsenal, established in 1942, was one of the U.S. <br />Army's last chemical weapons manufacturing facilities to be built during World Waz II. The major <br />types of contaminants at the azsenal include pesticides, solvents, metals, and pesticide and chemical <br />munitions breakdown products. According to the Tri-County Health Department, azsenal related <br />contamination can be found both onpost and offpost. The majority of offpost contamination is found <br />in the shallow, unconfined aquifer. In the mid to late 1980s, an offsite contamination assessment <br />was conducted and the Henderson azea, among others, was identified as containing high levels of <br />diisopropylmethylphosphonate (DIMP), a chemical unique to the Army's manufacture of GB nerve <br />gas, or sarin. In response to the findings of this investigation, the Water Quality Controi Division of <br />the State of Colorado established a Colorado ground water standazd of 8 µg/L for DIMP. This class <br />ofsemi-volatile organic compounds, though somewhat soluble, tends to adsorb on soil particles. <br />Given the known contaminant plume in this azea, excavation activities associated with removal of <br />aggregate materials within the zone of water table fluctuation will remobilize contaminants that had <br />adsorbed on the subsurface alluvial materials. This remobilization can produce an immediate threat <br />to human health by ingestion of contaminated drinking water supplies. Potential health impacts <br />associated with remobilization ofknown contaminants in this azea have not been addressed by the <br />applicant. <br />While the applicants permit documentation mentions the existence of a Storm Water Management <br />Plan and permit in addition to a Spill Prevention Control Plan, these existing plans have not been <br />modified to reflect the addition of the Jeronimus Property or proposed mining plan thereon. The <br />mining plan, Exhibit D, indicates that piping will be installed to convey wash water back to the lake <br />azeas from the Plant Site. Such a structure constitutes a point discharge to ground water and would <br />require issuance of a dischazge permit from the Watet Quality Control Division. Such a point <br />discharge may further concentrate existing contaminants dissolved in the ground water. The <br />applicant has not demonstrated the issuance or application for a Colorado Wastewater Dischazge <br />Permit for this property. <br />2 <br />