Laserfiche WebLink
SUMMARY: - 4 - <br />DEFINITIONS: <br />"Affected Land" <br />In the February 25, 2003 letter .from Rocky Mountain <br />Materials & Asphalt, Inc.it is c1;eAr.1'yFstated that: <br />"As an owner of property.that adjoins <br />.our property." <br />Therefore, our property:is affected..and it is very possible our land <br />will be disturbed as a result of Rocky Mountain's mining operation: <br />We feel the aesthetic beauty of our land.will be destroyed by their. <br />.operation. <br />We believe.. the noise, heavy.truck.traffic and much dust will create <br />great havoc to our property. . <br />"A99rieved" <br />We were very upset and. stressed .when we received notice.that a <br />Life of the Mine permit was applied. for; and that the operation <br />would be adjoining our property. <br />Although no one lives on the property.now,.we would suffer a <br />" a great loss as this.-type of .operation would: <br />''~ <br />a. .UPSET 5.rty plans the family .may have in the future for <br />their property; <br />b. spoil: any enhancement of ghat area; <br />c.. would ruin the aesthetic view from our property; <br />d. affect the value :of properties in that area; <br />e. Asa neighboc,to.this.type of.operation, we would receive <br />the brunt of the p3l,lution and,.toxins; and <br />f. we just don't want that type of operation fora neighbor. <br />Again, we are very concerned.about what impact this operation will have on our property; <br />and hope these concerns and objectjons.are.taken into consideration and that Rocky <br />Mountain is not grantbd:a~peemttt. <br />However, we realize the final .decision rests. with the Board.; AND, we would also like <br />to know, IF THE PERMIT IS GRANTED: <br />Would we still have access to our property, or <br />Would they cut us off? <br />Respectfully submitted,. <br />4 Jun ram ET <br />V 714 East Mesa Ave ue <br />" Pueblo, Colorado 81006 <br />