Laserfiche WebLink
<br />'. ~_ <br />_ ;1 <br />~; <br />,~ <br /> <br />The;dewatering affects of Phase. II could also be.used fo approximate"the worst case; <br />` <br />'scenario for Phase III: <br />- <br />°, <br />- ~ <br /> <br />From Exhibit G-1, Well Location Map, of the amendment application materials; it I <br />' appeazs that`:-the only'registered:wells located within 400 feet of-the .established !„ <br />mining boundazies are-owned by the operator. Therefore; impacts to established off-..: ' <br />site well users are n_ of anticipated from dewatering activities. However, mitigation <br />' ; <br />~ <br /> <br />measures presented in the ,original application are, still included. in the amendment ^ <br />.application: As stated in the original application: - ` i <br />If any substantial drawdown_does occur,during,mining,`and-is 'directly., <br />~ <br />ielated to ,the dewatering operation,'the operator will .work with the ;~ <br />.affected well owners to :mitigate --the impacts: Suggested .mitigation, , .:;. ^ <br />'alternatives include: 1); supplying,,' the owners 'with temporary <br /> <br />supplementary water, 2) lowering the pump in an existing well,- and 3) _ I <br />drilling anew well. ~ ~ ~> .~ <br />l <br />was not put to beneficial use pnor to dewatering activities, the <br />However„if the wel <br />- applicant should have no responsibility to provide mitigation. ; <br /> <br /> ^ <br /> <br />_ ~ .. <br />- ?'1 <br />~~^ <br />~: <br />_: <br />~ <br /> <br />