My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2004-06-16_REVISION - M1998052 (3)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1998052
>
2004-06-16_REVISION - M1998052 (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 11:01:04 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 8:35:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1998052
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
6/16/2004
Doc Name
Adequacy Response
From
L.F. Brown & Associates Inc.
To
DMG
Type & Sequence
CN1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
We committed to locating potential permanent fuel storage above the <br />100-year flood flow. Alpine Rock's calculations indicated that the 100-year <br />flood flow would be 3.26-feet above the normal flow. Normal flow is defined <br />as base flow, which is the flow during times other than spring runoff or <br />precipitation events. <br />As an added margin of safety, we will locate all permanent fuel storage <br />at least 3.26-feet above the elevation of the normal/ordinary high water mark <br />on the stream bank, perpendicular from the stream to the fuel storage location. <br />Such permanent storage tanks would be bermed and lined with a UV <br />resistant membrane and the capacity of the containment area will be sized to <br />accommodate 1.5 times the capacity of the tanks. Other materials, such as <br />lubricants, and ant'rfreeze, would, 'rf stored on site, also be located inside the <br />containment area. Also, as required, we would appropriately sign the area <br />stating that the fuel valve is to be manned at all times during fueling. <br />Alternatively, we reserve the right to service the fuel needs of the site <br />with a fuel tanker, or other mobile tank, both of which would be parked only <br />temporarily on site, and therefore not contained. <br />3. Waters of the United States <br />One of the things you specifically looked at during your inspection of <br />the site on June 1, 2004 was whether or not wetlands exist in the proposed <br />area of affected land. You did look at this, and, as discussed in your <br />Inspection Report, determined that, indeed, no wetlands exist within the 42- <br />acres to be mined, and that therefore you see no need to require a wetlands <br />delineation of the project. <br />We still realize that it will be necessary to contact the Corps of <br />Engineers with regard to the installation of culvert(s) to faalitate another <br />Access Road to the site. <br />4. Fugitive Dust <br />We will investigate the specific air permit requirements for this <br />operation and will contact the APCD as necessary. <br />5. Reclamation Costs <br />We will reclaim the site in two stages. The total mined area is <br />approximately 42 acres and we will reclaim the first hall of the site (21 acres) <br />when we are approximately one-half done, and reclaim the remaining 21 <br />acres when we are completely done. <br />The average height and maximum length of the "forward" working <br />faces at any time throughout the operation are estimated to be 30-feet tall <br />and 600-feet long. The average height and maximum length of side working <br />faces are estimated to be 10-feet tall and 2,600-feet long. The time required <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.