My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1995-08-16_REVISION - M1980120
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1980120
>
1995-08-16_REVISION - M1980120
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/10/2021 6:13:19 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 8:30:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1980120
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
8/16/1995
Doc Name
DMG 112 REGULAR OPERATION APPLICATION WORKSHEET CHECKLIST
Type & Sequence
AM1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
93
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />__- <br />TUTTLE APPLEGATE, INC. <br />Consultants for Land and Resource Development <br />Dr. Jeris A. Danielson <br />State Engineer <br />July 16, 1990 <br />Page 3 <br />2. OPERATIONAL LOSSES <br />Operational consumptive use includes the water removed from the <br />pits that are contained in the materials being mined. It was <br />estimated that 4% of the gross weight of the products removed is <br />water as suggested by the State Engineer's Office (See Table No. <br />2). Approximately 12,000 tons of material are removed from the <br />pit each year. <br />Dust control is being handled by applications of water and <br />calcium chloride. Water used for dust control was based on 21 <br />days of application and two tank loads per day. One tank holds <br />approximately 5,000 gallons. The corresponding monthly and <br />annual amounts of water used are found on Table No. 2. <br />No wash waters are used in the crushing and screening process <br />used by Weld County. <br />3. CREDIT FOR HISTORIC CONSUMPTIVE USE <br />No historic consumptive use credit was taken for the Koenig Pit <br />in this report. <br />C. REPLACEMENT <br />1. METHOD OF REPLACEMENT <br />The approach used in this study to replace stream depletions was <br />to use an existing pond as a recharge well. Equivalent pumping <br />rates were computed for lake losses and operational losses and <br />were totaled together with recharge pumping rates in order to <br />find the net effect on the stream system (See Table No. 3). <br />Summer irrigation water was used for recharging the aquifer and <br />thus eliminates the need for wintertime storage. <br />2. TIRING OF THE REPLACEMENTS <br />The calculation of the timing of the replacements was found by <br />using the computer model, 'Analytical Stream Depletion Model', by <br />Dewayne R. Schroder from the State Engineer's Office. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.