My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1992-05-14_REVISION - M1988112
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1988112
>
1992-05-14_REVISION - M1988112
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/19/2021 5:15:56 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 8:25:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1988112
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
5/14/1992
Doc Name
ANNUAL INSPECTION-WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITIES CDPES PN CO-NONE FOR BATTLE MOUNTAIN
From
CDOH
To
BATTLE MOUNTAIN RESOURCES INC
Type & Sequence
TR6
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Isydroxlde Cor pH contr~muratic acid (32% F1CL) • <br />for pH control, 98X sul uric acid For pH control, <br />and zinc/ferrous sulfate to complex free cyanide <br />in containment ponds. All substances are <br />contained within the site. Any spills will flow to <br />the upper containment pond. <br />Are additional controls necessary? N <br />Is the Materials Containment Plan adequate? Y <br />If no, explain. <br />8. Describe the wastewater treatment processes: <br />The baryon solution/spent ore goes to the AVR unit <br />(acidification-ventialization-regeneration unit <br />which is supposed to reduce the levels of free <br />cyanide to 4.4 mg/L. Afterwards, the !.urry goes <br />to either the upper or lower containment ponds <br />where U.V. light destroys the remaining free <br />cyanide. Water from the upper and lower ponds <br />then flows to the collection pond. This water is <br />recycled back to the upper or lower ponds and is <br />eventually pumped back to the process water tank <br />for re-use. <br />SECTION D: OPERATION/MAINTENANCE: <br />9. Evaluate the treatment Facility. Include in this evaluation a <br />discussion of any operation and maintenance problems: <br />The AVR does not perform as anticipated. <br />Excessive levels of CN- have been measured in the <br />containment ponds. BMG attributes this to poor <br />performance due to cold temperatures and ice <br />covered ponds. There have been reports by <br />citizens about dead ducks surrounding the <br />operation. BMG requested and got a technical <br />revision from MLRD to add zinc/ferrus sulfate to <br />complex the CN- and reduce the levels of free CN-. <br />This may create problems later on with the copper <br />complexed CN-. <br />10. How are solid wastes disposed? Could this disposal practice affect <br />water quality, including groundwater? Please describe in detail. <br />Spent ore is piped via slurry to the upper and <br />lower containment ponds. <br />11. Flow are hazardous wastes disposed? Could this disposal practice affect <br />water quality, including groundwater? Please describe in detail. <br />CUPEL, which is lead contaminated waste from the <br />lab, is shipped via U.S. Pollution Control Inc. <br />(USPCI) to Grassy Mountain Hazardous Waste Storage <br />Facility in Utah. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.