My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2007-01-31_REVISION - M1986015 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1986015
>
2007-01-31_REVISION - M1986015 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 5:42:30 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 8:25:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1986015
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
1/31/2007
Doc Name
Amendment
From
Continental Materials Corporation
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
AM3
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
146
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINING PLAN <br />Wash water for the processing of gravels is taken from the lake near the river. This lake is part of <br />the sediment control circuit. Therefore, when the plan[ is operating the draw down of the lake helps <br />reduce the volume discharged [o the river, but the discharge is still far more than could possibly be used <br />for [he plant. The wash water is pumped to the plant in a separate, closed line. During some periods, [he <br />wash water may be derived directly from the mining pit by altering the piping path. <br />The following diagram (Figure 1) shows [he current dewatering and process water circuit. This <br />diagram is taken from the Amendment 1 plan. It is expected this method will continue to be used as it is <br />quite successful. The only problem that might occur is if [he amount of water [hat needs [o be pumped <br />out, especially in the spring of the year when the river is running high, exceeds the capability to pump it <br />out. That has no[ occurred, but [he limit is being approached. On the plus side, when water tends to build <br />up in [he pit due to input exceeding output it dilutes sediment in the water resulting in very clear and <br />clean water except in [he immediate vicinity of the mining. The size of the pit also provides many <br />locations for establishing temporary sumps for pre-settling and clarification of the water prior [o pumping <br />into the sediment control system. <br />One action that would improve matters considerably is to establish more sediment basins against <br />the wall of [he pi[. This would reduce the input of water greatly. <br />PHASE 2: <br />Requirement: All dewatering of [he Phase 2 area shall be done via the initial pit in the <br />northeastern corner of Phase 2. Discharge from [he initial pi[ may be into Phase 1 or into the <br />adjacent existing channel (see next requirement). <br />DISCUSSION: The problems in Phase 2 are much simpler to deal with because the <br />groundwater barrier wall will likely be installed before or soon after the excavation is begun. Dewatering <br />will be into the initial pit in the northeast corner of the site or directly into Phase L (see Exhibit C-4B). <br />Most likely it will be the former with the initial pi[ becoming the dewatering settling basin. Water from <br />there can be pumped to Phase I, if the volume is not so great that i[ overloads the capacity of the Phase I <br />system. <br />Requirement: If discharge is into [he adjacent channel then a series of step dams must be installed <br />in the channel to reduce water velocity and remove sediment prior to its discharge into the river in <br />accordance with the standards se[ forth in the NPDES permit. <br />DISCUSSION: Alternatively, the water from the initial pit could be discharged to the river via <br />[he adjacent existing drainage channel. However, that route may not provide sufficient control of <br />Pueblo East Pit Amendment 3 (2007) Exhibit D Page 20 of 34 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.