My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1981-03-18_REVISION - M1977342
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1977342
>
1981-03-18_REVISION - M1977342
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/18/2021 12:09:02 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 8:21:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977342
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
3/18/1981
Doc Name
RESPONSE TO AMENDMENT ADEQUACY LETTER OF 02-18-81 HENDERSON PN M77-342
From
CLIMAX MOLYBDENUM CO
To
MLRD
Type & Sequence
AM1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
.~ ~ '~ <br />• III IIIIIIIII ('11111 <br />999 <br />CLIMAX MOLYBDEN~~UMvv COMPANY <br />A DIVISION OF AMM INC. <br />HENDERSON MINE <br />Box 68 <br />Empire, Colorado 80438 <br />(303) 569-3221 <br />March 19, 1981 <br /> <br />,' BIZ i ~ ~9a~ <br />fv",ii~it~ i_i~.~!D RFCLAC!~RTION <br />Mr. James B. McArdle Colo. Dept. ~f p~~atural Resources <br />Mined Land Reclamation Division <br />423 Centennial Building <br />1313 Sherman Street <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />Re: Response to Amendment Adequacy Letter of Februacy 18, <br />1981, Henderson Permit #77-342 <br />Dear Mr. McArdle: <br />We appreciate your prompt response to our request for a <br />pre-hearing conference. Herein we are responding to each <br />question asked in the adequacy letter; however, we must <br />stress that many of our responses are for edification <br />purposes only. No significant changes in the approved mining <br />or reclamation plans are proposed in the amendment. The <br />information in this response, therefore, should not be <br />construed as altering existing or creating new obligations as <br />to matters not covered by the amendment. we do understand, <br />however, your desire for explanatory information which may <br />enhance your understanding of our program and have tried to <br />answer your questions accordingly. <br />A. Pre-Mining and Mining Plan Maps <br />1. Have all of the roads and buildings been portrayed? See <br />Rule 2.12(3)(b). <br />Yes, to the best of our knowledge, all buildings <br />and roads have been portrayed on the map in accord <br />with rule 2.12(3)(b). <br />B. Mining Plan <br />1. The subsidence on Red Mountain which is directly <br />attributable to the mining operation has not been <br />addressed nor has it been portrayed on the mining plan <br />maps. Please supply this information. <br />2. Please note that the following statement exists on page <br />5-4 of the original application, "Surface subsidence is <br />not expected to occur at Henderson." Since subsidence <br />has occured, what mitigation measures will be taken? <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.