My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2004-11-02_REVISION - M1978116
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1978116
>
2004-11-02_REVISION - M1978116
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 2:53:51 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 8:15:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1978116
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
11/2/2004
Doc Name
Responses to Questions of Second Adequacy Review
From
Cotter Corporation
To
DMG
Type & Sequence
AM1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
APPENDIX-D <br />The estimate of riprap size needed to protect the diversion berms from erosion has <br />been determined. This was done using methods described in NUREG-1623, Sept. <br />2002, Design of Erosion Protection for Long Term Stabilization, Appendix D and <br />NUREG/CR-4651, May 1987, Develoroment of Ripraro Design Criteria b~R~raro <br />Testin¢ in Flumes: Phase I, section 3.4.3, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Method. <br />The rock sizing is based on computing the sheaz stress, which is a function of <br />velocity, slope, and depth. This method is suitable for situations where flow depth is <br />small relative to riprap size. <br />The channels will be constructed as the diversion berms are built with a bulldozer. <br />As a result, the channel shape will be somewhat variable, but will approach an <br />average triangular cross-section which will be over 10 feet wide by at least 2 feet <br />deep. The slope will be approximately 0.10 where the natural gully of either subbasin <br />intersects the diversion berms. Within a few tens of feet downstream, the gradient <br />flattens, resulting in slower, wider, shallower flow. Therefore, riprap will only be <br />placed at the intersection areas, unless observations during the life of the mine <br />indicate the need for expansion. <br />The following table shows the calculated DSO of riprap needed at each berm segment <br />for both the 10-year and 100-year events. The unit weight of rock used in these <br />calculations is that of the locally available sandstone, 1451b/ft': <br />10-yr 100-yr <br />-cfs depth_ft V-ft/sec D o -cfs depth_ft V-ft/sec DSa <br />Berm <br />Se¢. 1 0.56 0.243 2.9 5.5 in 2.67 0.452 4.0 10.25 in <br />Berm <br />SQE. Z 1.36 0.345 3.5 7.8 in 6.64 0.648 4.9 14.7 in <br />The berms will be protected during the mining operation life by rock that averages <br />about 12 inches. The final footprint of the reclaimed waste rock dump will depend on <br />the size of the pile attained during mining. The larger rock calculated for the 100- <br />year event at berm segment 2 will not be placed until final reclamation is complete. <br />At that time, particularly if the waste rock pile did not progress as far north as <br />presently allowed, the berm and channel configuration will be re-evaluated. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.