My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1992-07-06_REVISION - M1988112
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1988112
>
1992-07-06_REVISION - M1988112
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/19/2021 7:17:22 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 7:51:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1988112
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
7/6/1992
Doc Name
SAN LUIS PROJECT PN M-88-112 ADEQUACY REVIEW OF PROPOSED TR-09 SURFACE & GROUND WATER CONTAINMENT PL
From
MLRD
To
JAMES A PENDLETON
Type & Sequence
TR9
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />Memo to James A. Pendleton 2 July 6, 1992 <br />If the Quality AssurancefQuality Controls Protocols cover frequency of sampling <br />and analysis of cyanide under such circumstances, a more specific reference <br />should be provided. Otherwise, a sampling frequency and cyanide analysis should <br />be indicated. BMR should also commit to continuation of such sampling and <br />analysis until the Division releases them from the requirement. <br />4. The positions of the approved ground water containment well series will be fixed, <br />presumably within a few hundred feet of the tailings facilities. It is conceivable <br />that a substantial surface release of cyanide-laden water from the facilities, <br />following the local drainage, might carry beyond the influence of the approved <br />ground water containment wells before infiltrating and percolating to the level of <br />local ground water. Nothing in the proposal, as presented, considers and evalu- <br />ates the possibility of such an event or proposes any appropriate interception <br />and/or containment measures. <br />BMR should develop and include, as part of this technical revision, an evaluation <br />of this possibility and a description of what, if any, measures would be necessary <br />and taken to deal with such a situation. <br />5. Installation of wells necessary to control the hydraulic gradient down radient of <br />the tailings facility will not accomplish this control in a timely way u~ess all <br />accessory equipment necessary, i.e., pumps, tubing, etc., are available. <br />BMR should commit to provide, as part of its eventual ground water containment <br />plan, such details of well design and accessory equipment as will be itistalled, <br />maintained on site, etc., in order to provide assurance that the wells iptended for <br />use in controlling the hydraulic gradient, dedicated or otherwise, can be quickly <br />and effectively put to or converted to such use. <br />6. Contamination of unsaturated soils by surface flow from the failings facility may <br />occur but "appropriate actions" to be taken by BMR with the material, following <br />analysis, are not specified. <br />BMR should commit to receiving Division approval of the disposition of such <br />samples before such final action is taken. <br />JCS/bjw <br />M:'~OSS jbjw/Memo.JCS <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.