Laserfiche WebLink
Letter to LafazQe West, Inc. 3 February 11 2005 <br />cottonwoods will be protected and how they will be protected. It has been shown that <br />groundwater dewatering can kill cottonwoods. Will the o erator take measures to rever <br />e mg o cottonwoo s t ough groundwater dewatering? If so, please describe these <br />measures. <br />b) A copy of the January 21, 2005 DOW comment letter is enclosed. Please respond to their <br />concerns regarding: <br />i) Bald Eagle winter night roosts, <br />ii) Perch buffers and leaving a portion of Prairie Dog Colony A intact for a food <br />supply for raptors, <br />iii) The need for aBlack-footed Ferret survey and a March 1-October 31 survey for <br />Burrowing Owls. <br />iv) The question of the need for a survey for the presence of Mountain Plovers. <br />5. Proof of Notice <br />As noted in the Division's December 9, 2004 "Receipt of Amendment Application" letter sent <br />to Mr. Eric Reckentine of Lafarge West, Inc., "Proof of notice and mailings, such as Certified <br />Mail-Return Receipt Requested, must be submitted to the Division of Minerals and Geology <br />Division will not make a decision but will make a recommendation to the MLRB, the proof of <br />publication and other notices must be submitted prior to the recommendation, which is <br />scheduled for February 25, 2005. <br />6. Additional comments <br />a) The Division wishes to point out to the applicant that since this is an amendment to an existing <br />pernut, all commitments, requirements and stipulations that were incorporated into the original <br />permit aze also applicable to the amended areas. <br />b) On the Mine Plan Maps there is a note (Notes - #1) that "The mine cell location and limits are <br />conceptual, their size and shape may vary due to geologic andlor site conditions." Please <br />change all maps to remove references to "conceptual" plans, the Division cannot accept or <br />approve "conceptual" submittals. The Division also requests that the statement `"These phases <br />aze neither representative of the maximum azea of disturbance nor do they limit disturbance to a <br />single phase." removed from the application documents since such a statement makes the <br />phasing and associated bonding difficult or impossible to regulate. Changes to the approved <br />permit or amendment must be done by submitting a revision or amendment to the Division and <br />obtaining the Division's approval. <br />