My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1993-03-30_REVISION - M1977378 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1977378
>
1993-03-30_REVISION - M1977378 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/20/2021 8:04:28 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 7:43:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977378
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
3/30/1993
Doc Name
Evaluation of Hydraulic and Hydrochemical Aspects of Proposed Bulkheads
From
Sunnyside Gold Corp.
To
DMG
Type & Sequence
TR14
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
156
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
However, the semi-log plots of the recovery data from both 700 and 704 produced <br />straight lines. The calculated "transmissivities" from the recovery plots for 700 and <br />704 are 2,000 gallons per day per foot (gpd/ft) and 1,300 gpd/ft, respectively (Table <br />31• Due to the nature of the testing these calculated values should not be considered <br />true transmissivities. Rather, the calculated value is a function of the average <br />hydraulic conductivity and the length of the hole. The calculated hydraulic <br />conductivities range from 0.1 to 0.2 ft/day. The calculated hydraulic conductivities <br />are expected to be of the correct order of magnitude. <br />Both the semi-log drawdown and recovery plots for the second test (hole 781) <br />produced straight lines. The calculated hydraulic conductivities are on the order of <br />0.2 ft/day. <br />The geometric mean of the calculated hydraulic conductivities is 0.15 ft/day. <br />However, the rock in the vicinity of the flow tests exhibits more fracture permeability <br />than is typical for the American Tunnel. Therefore, this calculated hydraulic <br />conductivity is expected to be considerably higher than the general average for <br />fractured rocks in the area. <br />sunny\wp\traci\2251\Mar1993.Rpt 32 <br />H`a! SIR1011 HYDRO-SERRCH <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.