My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2007-08-07_REVISION - M2003016
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M2003016
>
2007-08-07_REVISION - M2003016
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/16/2021 6:15:25 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 7:23:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2003016
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
8/7/2007
Doc Name
Underdrain as built Construction Report
From
Civil Resources
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
TR3
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1.0 PROJECT OVERVIEW <br />1.1 Introduction <br />This Construction Report documents the construction activities completed for the Heit Pit Underdrain for the Heit Pit <br />Aggregate Operation in Weld County, Permit M-2003-016. The Heit Pit groundwater impact due to the proposed slurry <br />wall was presented and historic groundwater elevations and fluxuations were determined as part of Technical Revision <br />#2 (TR-2), dated September 14, 2005, by Wright Water Engineers, Inc. Based on conversations with staff members at <br />the Division of Reclamation and Mine Safety (DRMS), an underdrain design was developed, presented and approved in <br />Technical Revision #3 (TR-3), dated March 9, 2007 by Civil Resources, LLC. This Construction Report discusses the <br />overall project concept, observed and reported construction steps, and changes from the approved TR-3. <br />1.2 Project Summary <br />The underdrain construction was completed to mitigate the potential "mounding" of groundwater against the recently <br />constructed slurry wall. The Heit Pit area prevailing groundwater flow direction is north-northeast toward the South <br />Platte River. Locally, the groundwater levels and flow directions are also impacted by: 1) the groundwater "shadow <br />effect" from the slurry walled Koenig Pit immediately to the south of Weld County Road (WCR) 20 and the proposed Heit <br />Pit, and 2) the Little Dry Creek drainage which roughly parallels the west side of the Heit Pit at distances ranging from <br />230 feet to 450 feet to the low flow channel. The slurry wall around the Heit Pit could cause "mounding" of groundwater <br />on the upstream side of the proposed slurry wall as described in TR-2. The designed underdrain system minimizes <br />upstream mounding to within an acceptable range of two foot within historic levels. <br />The underdrain design installs a perforated pipe with no slope within the overlapping zones of the permitted two foot rise <br />of average groundwater elevation for the growing and non-growing seasons. The capacity of each underdrain was sized <br />to convey the calculated aquifer flow currently being conveyed through the Heit Pit. Due to the pit configuration and <br />existing topographic features, underdrain systems are designed to flow to Little Dry Creek. The underdrain daylights <br />roughly 400 feet north of the southwest corner of the slurry wall, onto a riprap pad and surface flows across the existing <br />broad drainage to the low flow channel of Little Dry Creek. <br />The construction of the project was completed by Hall-Irvin. The project included approximately S00 feet of six inch <br />diameter perforated pipe, 400 feet of eight inch diameter perforated pipe, filter fabric around each pipe run, three <br />standpipe cleanouts with protective surface casing, riprap outfall protection, and crushed aggregate for pipe bedding and <br />cover. Excess trenching cut material was spoiled on-site. <br />The completed construction was modified from the approved TR-3 as discussed with yourself via phone on July 2, 2007. <br />Those changes are discussed in Section 3.0. <br />2.0 UNDERDRAIN CONSTRUCTION <br />Construction of the underdrain began at the southwest corner of the piton the south pipe. Due to the prevalence of very <br />sandy soil and groundwater elevations above the pipe invert, a twenty foot trench box was used to shore the trench <br />sides during installation. Multiple submersible pumps were used fo minimize the amount of standing water in the <br />exposed trench. The contractor placed the filter sock covered perforated pipe to specified elevation using a construction <br />level from the multiple construction hubs and stakes placed by their surveyor. Pipe was bedded and covered in imported <br />granular material. Vertical cleanouts were installed per plans. The South six inch diameter perforated pipe was <br />connected to the west side eight inch pipe via a 90 degree sweep followed by an eight inch to six inch coupler and <br />vertical cleanout standpipe. Construction of the eight inch west side drain followed the same procedure as the south <br />side pipe with trench boxing, pumping, and pipe bedding/cover. Both trenches were backfilled with trenching spoils and <br />compacted by track and wheel rolling with on-site heavy equipment. <br />Construction Report- Heit Pil Underdrain - 1 - August, 2007 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.