Laserfiche WebLink
Jodi <br />-----Original Message----- <br />From: Gonima, Deb [mailto:deb.gonima~state.co.us] <br />Sent: Friday, June 23, 2006 9:35 AM <br />To: Jodi Villa <br />Cc: Gonima, Deb <br />Subject: RE: DMG Letter (3811-DMG) <br />Jodi, <br />No, I didn't get anything in the mail associated with this permit. <br />I'll let you know when I do. Hopefully it will be today. <br />When I receive it would you like for me to fax you a copy? <br />Do you need me to mail one, too? <br />-Deb <br />Deb Gonima <br />Environmental Protection Specialist <br />Division of Minerals and Geology <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman Street, Rm 215 <br />Denver, CO 80203 <br />www.mining.state.co.us <br />ph. 303-666-4179 <br />fax 303-832-8106 <br />-----Original Message----- <br />From: Jodi Villa [mailto:JVi11a~Meurer.com] <br />Sent: Friday, June 23, 2006 9:18 AM <br />To: 'Gonima, Deb' <br />Subject: RE: DMG Letter (3811-DMG) <br />Deb, <br />Did you ever get a utility letter in the mail yesterday for this project? I think Fred <br />said it was Rocky Mountain Pipeline who put it in the mail to you. <br />Jodi <br />-----Original Message----- <br />From: Gonima, Deb [mailto:deb.gonima®state.co.us] <br />Sent: Friday, June 23, 2006 8:52 AM <br />To: Jodi Villa; Deb Gonima (E-mail) <br />Cc: Tyler Packard (E-mail); Brad Davis (E-mail); <br />mail); Mount, Carl; Rowe, Chris; Wenzel, Richard; <br />Subject: RE: DMG Letter (3811-DMG) <br />Jodi, <br />Fred Tafoya (E-mail); Levi Denton (E- <br />Schreiner, Tom <br />Please address the questions we posed at the meeting regarding the slurry wall off-site <br />effects (to the south and east), the concerns we have about the ground water monitoring <br />plan, and well placement ONLY as part of the second adequacy review. <br />Currently the above items are NOT considered potentially significant enough to warrant <br />consideration as an amendment, and should not be addressed in relation to the letter faxed <br />to you yesterday. However, you are correct in your understanding that these items will <br />need to be addressed as part of our second adequacy review. <br />These second adequacy review comments will be prepared by Friday June 30, 2006, and will <br />specify the information necessary. <br />2 <br />