My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2006-08-23_REVISION - M1982015
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1982015
>
2006-08-23_REVISION - M1982015
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 2:53:32 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 6:59:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1982015
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
8/23/2006
Doc Name
Various emails from Jodi Villa/DRMS
From
Jodi Villa / DRMS
To
Jodi Villa/ DRMS
Type & Sequence
AM1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
67
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
utilities. CDOT has been sent notification regarding the berm/rip-rap and they have the <br />opportunity to comment; and there are no ditches within 200' of the berm. Shouldn't we <br />just be getting letters from companies that we originally were required to obtain? <br />Attached is a draft of the new letter for your review. Please let me know if this is <br />acceptable, <br />Thanks, <br />Jodi Villa <br />Project Manager <br />P.S. Any luck scheduling a meeting with Mr. Berry? <br />«utility letter 2.doc » <br />Meurer & Associates, Inc. <br />Engineers ~ Designers ~ Consultants <br />143 Union Boulevard, Suite 600 <br />Lakewood, CO 80228 <br />TEL: 303-985-3636 <br />FAX: 303-985-3800 <br />TOLL FREE: 1-866-535-5285 <br />EMAIL: jvilla~meurer.com <br />WEB: www.meurer.com <br />CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended <br />recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. If you are not the <br />intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the <br />original message. The sender and Meurer & Associates will not accept any responsibility <br />for viruses (if any) associated with this email or its possible attachments. <br />EMAIL FROM May 18th: <br />Hi Jodi, <br />First I would say that you should include the exact language verbatim in the letter from <br />regulation 34-32.5-115(4)(e). I don't see any problem with sending the letter, with the <br />public notification, but as it pertains to landownership - Carma owns the land, but <br />Siegrist (with Meurer as the ' <br />contractor) is the operator (and OUR permitee). So, the potentially liable entity is <br />actually Siegrist/Meurer, that is until you guys do a succession of operators and move <br />operator status to Carma. Until that time, Siegrist is still the potentially 'responsible <br />party financially in case of damage and should be listed as such in any documentation. <br />Let me know if you need any further clarification. <br />Thanks for checking with me first - hopefully that helps. <br />-Deb <br />Deb Gonima <br />Environmental Protection Specialist <br />Division of Minerals and Geology <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman Street, Room 215 <br />Denver, CO 80203 <br />303-866-4176 ph. <br />303-832-6106 fax <br />[Gonima, Deb] <br />-----Original Message----- <br />From: Jodi Villa [mailto:JVi11a~Meurer.com] <br />Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2006 7:44 AM <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.