Laserfiche WebLink
iii iiiiiiiiiiiui~i <br />~AIPI~^ ± at~c ~'=~z;,,,t„-~,~1 1711ylSloiV <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman St., Rooni 2:5 <br />Denver, CO 80203 <br />303 866-3567 <br />FA%:303 832-8106 <br />sT~T~~~ c~~.o~.~,~j <br />J,~~'~(n <br />~~= '~ <br />N~l~ \' o <br />• ~8m• <br />• L~~. <br />' ~avs' <br />Roy Romer, <br />Gorenror <br />DATE : Md 1, 1 992 Michael B. Long, <br />y Division Diregar <br />T0: Mr. Art Lefler <br />c/o Gary Dodson <br />Battle Mountain; San Luis ~~ <br />FROM: Harry Posey <br />RE: Tailings Pond Characterization <br />This memo is to confirm our earlier conversation today and to call your attention <br />to other items. <br />The purpose of the pond characterization study is twofold: (1) to determine <br />variation in metal and cyanide levels throughout the ponds in order to <br />(2) determine how to collect representative samples from each pond for future <br />monitoring or to verify that previous sampling has been representative. <br />2. The number and location of the samples taken for pond characterization is up <br />to Battle Mountain to determine. In any case the sampling should be adequate <br />to determine both the vertical and horizontal variability in the pond. <br />3. Recognizing that holding time is a critical component of cyanice analysts, you <br />should know prior to sample collection whether your contract lab can handle <br />the volume of samples you are collecting or whether they can adequately <br />preserve the samples to prevent sample degradation. Your suggestion to employ <br />Adrian Smith to make that determination, while commendable, cannot abrogate <br />the lab's responsibility for verifying that their reported values are reliable. <br />4. As a reminder, please recall that the NOPU abatement plan specifies that <br />environmental monitoring modifications must be complete by July 9. <br />5. <br />Please call me if you have questions. <br />HHP/ern <br />cc: Bruce Humphries <br />Mike Long <br />Larry Oehler <br />Jim Pendle*_on <br />Jim Stevens <br />9992E <br />The Division iterates again that we do not believe your present, in-house <br />probe method for detecting free cyanide is capable of yielding accurate <br />analyses using the direct detection method. More reliable methods indicate <br />that levels in the ponds are 10 times greater or more than the levels detected <br />