My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2003-08-28_REVISION - M2000113 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M2000113
>
2003-08-28_REVISION - M2000113 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/16/2021 6:08:30 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 6:44:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2000113
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
8/28/2003
Doc Name
Revision
From
High Country Engineering
To
DMG
Type & Sequence
TR2
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />E R O 5 1 O N & S E D I M ENT C O N T R O L <br />Wichita's I®TeW Channel <br />Prevents Flooclin~ <br />RoyJ. Nelsen, Manager ofTechntcal Services <br />WATER diversion systems and a <br />levee protect much of Wichita, <br />Kansas, From flooding of the Arkansas <br />and little Arkansas Rivers. When the <br />dry expedences heavy rains and thun- <br />derstorms, certain areas are subJect to <br />sedous flooding. This was especially <br />true of the populated resldendal area <br />along East Tttird Street North, where <br />some of the more severe flows <br />occurred. <br />Far decades, Third Street North <br />had.CNCn.v~rvlllYe[se.f~~nrtinn< Ifnot <br />only cazded traffic, but also carried <br />stormwater runoff. The maJodty of the <br />time, the water consisted of a low <br />flow of about 2 to 10 cubic feet per <br />second, Periodically, though, the <br />drainage channel would run full and <br />dose Third Street North including <br />almost all the cross streets to traffic. In <br />too many instances, the drainage <br />problems at Third Street North seated <br />emergency situations and stranded <br />motorists who had to be.rescued from <br />the Flooding. As a result, the potential <br />for an accident where a drowning <br />may occur was always a concern for <br />the city, <br />The contract to plan a new <br />drainage system for Third Street North <br />was awarded to ~ Mtd-Kansas <br />Engineering Consultants, Inc. (MKEC), <br />a Wichita-based firm with years of <br />drainage design experience, and <br />Golsen Livingston Architects, a local <br />-atchitecturaL~lrtr~ _with_landscape <br />expertlse. They presented the city <br />with a number of options and design <br />alternatives far the three-quarters of a <br />.mile long project. These plans were <br />discussed !n numerous city and neigh- <br />borhood meetings, where public input <br />was sought. <br />'The street's combined function <br />was unacceptable,' states Neil <br />jednoralskl, Water Resources Engineer <br />at MKEC. "In order far Third Stree[ to <br />have remained open to traffic, Its sur- <br />face would have had to be raised to fit <br />the incoming streets and a storm <br />sewer would need to be installed to <br />handle the upstream drainage area." <br />Those oqt o s. filleluded a <br />~,•',~ <br />choice o~',: s one-lined <br />channel, S;tu. roc;partially- <br />~, <br />lined co . b " ce? c `annel, a <br />crass-lin' _ a~inel or <br />with a g~Cs-lirjed pilot <br />channel. , i, .: ~.~ <br />I[ was eventually determined that <br />the street could not be raised, due to <br />an abundance of underground utlli- <br />ties, especially the sanitary sewer, and <br />stlll install a storm sewer to handle the <br />runoff. It was decided that the most <br />effective design would he to close <br />Third Street North to all through and <br />cross-traffic, and turn it into a <br />drainage channel. <br />'We provided many different <br />canal design options to the dry,' says <br />Jednoralskt. 'Those options included <br />a choice of a stone-lined channel, a <br />full or pazdally-fined concrete chan- <br />nel, agrass-lined channel or one that <br />was grass-lined with agabion-lined <br />pllot channel. The last option was <br />chosen based on a tluee step level <br />decLsion process; economic, perform- <br />ance and aesthetics.' <br />The design called for a composite <br />channel liner system that incorporated <br />gabion reinforced tiprap (rocks in <br />steel cages) in the bottom area and <br />vegetation reinforced with North <br />November/December 2002 Iand sad Wata <br />After wnstruction of We evnerate and gabion Iinad low now channel, rha side slopes of <br />efe main channel were gradsd, seedatl, and permanently protected with a eomposite•rurt <br />reinforcement matting. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.