My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1989-11-22_REVISION - M1988112
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1988112
>
1989-11-22_REVISION - M1988112
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/19/2021 7:58:29 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 6:39:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1988112
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
11/22/1989
Doc Name
TAILINGS COLUMN TESTING PROCEDURES BATTLE MTNS SAN LUIS PROJECT
Type & Sequence
AM1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
81
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />-2s- <br /> <br />indicative of stage 3 of the acid production process, however, may not have <br />been reached in the 4 weeks allowed in our test. <br />Neither washout nor lag time appears to account for the similar <br />sulfate production rates for innoculated and non-innoculated samples in the <br />experiment results reported here. We conclude the bacteria were riot able <br />to survive in significant numbers on the samples tested. Low bacteria <br />survival may be due to the elevated pH of the samples at the time of <br />innoculation or a difficulty in acclimating to the mineralogy of the <br />samples. <br />3.2.2 Particle Size. In general, the smaller particle sizes <br />exhibited a lower final pH after 10 weeks (Table 5). Sulphate generation, <br />however, showed only a slight tendency to increase with smaller particle <br />sizes. Cumulative acidity was significantly greater for the smaller <br />,particle fraction (Figure 7). The relationship between cumulative acidity <br />and mean particle size was best represented by: Cumulative Acidity (mg as <br />CaCOg) = 43.8 x (mean particle size; mm)-0.24 with a correlation <br />coefficient of 0.99. <br />The total exposed surface area of each sample was calculated <br />assuming the particles were cubes with a specific gravity of 4.5. The <br />surface area for the 81, 62, 83, and B4 samples was found to be 1660, 610, <br />340, and 140 cm2 respectively. The relationship between cumulative acidity <br />and total exposed surface area fit a linear function of: cumulative acid- <br />ity (mg as CaC03) = 0.011 x (surface area; cm2) + 21.6 with a correlation <br />coefficient of 0.91. <br />Hawley and Shikaze (;i2) conclude that the single greatest factor <br />that controls the rate of acid formation is probably available surface <br />area. Kleinmann et. al. (2) in experiments with high sulfur coals from <br />the eastern U.S. found a fairly consistent doubling of acid production and <br />iron concentrations in both sterile and innoculated tests when particle <br />size was reduced by an order of magnitude (0.2-20 cm to 0.02-0.2 cm). <br />However, a study of acid generation rates using a soxhlet reactor found <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.